Project 1999 - ******Official politics thread ******

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)

- Off Topic (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)

- - ******Official politics thread ****** (/forums/showthread.php?t=260341)

Ill find a way to get to Shapiro one of these days.

So pedophiles have been watching youtube videos of kids playing, exercising etc...

And apparently that means we need to double down on censorship and demonetizing people's home videos of their kids!

Because...someone might watch them and get sexually excited. So removing and demonetizing will help because...because...

There is no reason. It's just a tactic used by the MSM to put pressure on youtube. They do a blitz of articles about "Youtube profiting off pedophiles!" and then youtube feels the pressure to demonetize videos so they can respond "Nuh-uh"

Youtube is a big threat to the traditional news networks because a lot of young people get their news there and not the MSM. So they are trying to turn Youtube into another CNN.

Edit: who cares? Well, generally censorship and civil rights violations start with Terrorists and pedophiles. That's the trial balloon for more sweeping action.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Throndor (Post 2875816)

Just keep supporting systemic racism and bigotry against whites and jews; maybe we can bring on a second holocaust. That'll get em!

Nobody is going to be able to overthrow the whites in this country. They have the vast majority of guns, political power, and they own most the cultural heritage that is America.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JurisDictum (Post 2875817)

JD truposting

I consider myself a good influence

Well I might not always vote democrat. College was like, 10% of what scrambled my brain dude.

You know, when we founded this country we didn't believe in this kind of functionalist BS. It wasn't until big plantation owner Jefferson decided to form a faction to change shit, that this two party system got started.

All those degrees listed are fine...its the Humanities/Identity degrees that churn out useless assholes that know nothing but sophistry.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Throndor (Post 2875850)

They're not "fine", though.

Sociology has been proven multiple times (Sokal Affair, and many more copycat Hoaxes) to be nothing more than an echo chamber of correlation = causation; it's not even a science its just a bunch of social rejects agreeing with each other about how bad being "normal" is.

Recent developments in "Psychology" have declared that the natural human nature of men, throughout history, is essentially a mental disease; thus outting itself as an ideological echo chamber that cannot be equated to "Science", as well.

Do we need to go into the details as to why Political "Science"s exceptionalization of the norm, and normalization of the exception is an inherently flawed approach to analyzing normative political theory?

Well I'm sure you kind find bullshit masters/PHD programs that get into a lot of that. But most of those BA degrees are just basic stuff about how to read statistics and foundational concepts etc.

A lot of times those more new controversial ideas are barely covered by a passing comment in the actual classes. Most the time the kids are just confused about what the definition of "psychosis" is.

I mean the BA is kind of the new High school diploma for my generation and the ones after me.

Sociology leads mostly to social work. Counseling etc. But there is a lot of Marxist concepts in it. He was the guy that talked about class, and class is an important concept for social workers.

Psychology either leads to more psychology, or just using some facts about interpersonal relations to help their human resource or administrative career etc.

Political Science mostly leads to bureaucrats and law school. Not a bad one for cops either.

But you could get a PHD in some BS identity stuff in any of these subjects.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JurisDictum (Post 2875817)

no, dude. there were people exploiting their children. it was a genuine problem.

Quote:

Originally Posted by misterbonkers (Post 2875864)

no, dude. there were people exploiting their children. it was a genuine problem.

why can't the video man say more than 1 sentence before a cut? what an irritating style

There definitely are issues with some shady shit being uploaded to YouTube, but if I can put my tinfoil hat on...

*equips hat*

YouTube is demonitizing videos because they want to claim the ad revenue, instead of giving it to the creator.

YouTube runs at a loss. In order to recoup some costs, they need to claim more ad revenue.

The advertisers don't care. They don't even know which videos their ads are being shown on.

YouTube just wants that sweet sweet ad revenue. Ads continue to show on demonitized videos. The only difference is the creator doesn't get the money.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Throndor (Post 2875867)

In actuality, most of the foreground and well stated theories in these fields were covered quite adequately by our great thinkers nearly a century ago; back when one was allowed to put forth their theories without being forced to piggyback on existing theories. Nowadays, in post-graduate programs, students are being pushed to "expand" the field in new ways that haven't already been completely explored; thus you have slews and slews of pointless post-graduate exploration into fringe concepts that really have no relevance to the majority of society, but stir up a great deal of passion with the mental/social rejects that the message resonates with.

Thus, the SJW is born; armed with pseudo-scientific "facts" at their disposal while completely oblivious and ignorant to well-established facts and precedence upon which the tertiary exploration was launched, and a complete disdain/disregard for the core subject upon which their fringe token-coverage was borne.

Couple this, with societies love affair for self-prescribed victimhood, and here we are; at a race to the bottom.

Well the vast majority of all that field expanding stuff goes unread and uncovered in BA/BS programs*. I spent a lot more time with old thinkers than anything new.

You have to go looking for that to find it in the social sciences.

*the vast majority of all that shit is read by like 3-4 people at most. It's just a form of punching the clock for researchers.