They're better than Warrior heals. :D

Paladin heals can be very useful in certain situations. On live paladins in my groups would often save some mana for emergency heals for when the healer would pull aggro off the MT.

My main is a Paladin and I'm not diminishing the utility of Paladin heals at all, I'm just against misrepresenting them as something they're not. For example:

- Trying to say Paladins heal better than Druids/Shamans at certain level brackets
- Trying to compare Paladin heals across expansions to the heals Druids/Shamans are limited to in classic

These types of arguments merit nothing except an "lolwut."

im refering to classic only. Paladins get Gheal at 39. Druid/Shaman at 29. Any advances in healing is 51+ which we may or may not see for some time. Paladin healing is a major part of the class's utlity. I'm not selling, I'm stating. I corrected my prior level bracket mistake, so please chillax brah :P I'm not a paladin, never been a paladin, just grouped with many many outstanding ones which have shown they are alot more than a 3rd rate warrior with minor healing and yaulp. The server could greatly benefit from having more on hand, as opposed to more and more troll sks that never make it past 20.

that sounds like a fucking shitty group.

The most a Paladin should be healing is off healing enchanters or other casters during downtime to save Cleric some mana. Or in an emergency situation when Lay Hands is down. If you're the main healer as a Paladin in your group, that sounds like a horrible group.