Again, Macken fails at structuring a question...

/facepalm

Should read, for the answer he wants anyway, which server was the most hardcore / extreme... In which case it should be Sullon > Rallos... maybe.

Now that I think about it, toughest to play might have been evil team Vallon / Tallon... it was 9v1 for most of us. Non stop fighting alliance everywhere you went. But between Nek and Grobb there werent many alliance, so we usually ran Guk...

I dunno, Rallos being the original makes me think it was the toughest to play. Learning content + pvp = hard...

I dunno, tough call, FFA or 2v1? Thats the question imo.

So its agreed then? Macken is fail? Thought I was the only person who knew.

Rallos Zek. And not because of item loot.

It didn't matter what "team" you were on, there was no team. No safe race or safe zone. A pure free for all kill target means the guy next to you could be lvling or could be buying gear off you one moment, and turn around and kill you the next. You were not safe from anyone. Anywhere. Ever. Not even in your own starting zone next to a member of your own race.. nobody.

In fact on Rallos we called those people Kinslayers. Likely no term like this existed on the other servers, because you were safe from your own race, or your own team.

I'm sorry you and Doors got caught in my troll net. But facts are facts. The poll question could have been structured in any number of ways for SZ to win.
I just arbitrarily chose the words i did.

The whole poll is a troll. Everyone knows SZ was the top server to play. This is only a poll to pass the time until red99 is released, and to identify anyone claiming their server was harder, tougher, more hard-core, more red etc...and then to make alot of fun of them.

Personally i lump anyone claiming SZ was not THE SERVER TO PLAY as someone who has the potential to not be honest with themselves or others and unrealistic or biased towards themselves in the face of overwhelming facts.... for future considerations in any other discussions

I support this.

Hey bros lets hold hands and blacklist people who pk others. We can also bag our gear at any sign of pvp since thats fun. Then we can race to attain no drop gear where looting players is moot.

When velious launches we can all participate together and join forces like Voltron to kill the sleeper.

4 level pvp range is awesome too. Between that and all the alliances, it will be like p99 with optional & consequential pvp.

lol fkn rz ngr fag

yea i agree the only problem with item loot or like a really global leaderboard setup is it leads to some really pussy pvp.

then again, i always pussy pvp regardless so it has little effect on me besides less gankportunities

I was actually commenting on the original posted question, which was:

Which Zek was the toughest.

I wouldn't want to play on an style RZ anymore, it was exactly as was mentioned, running while bagging and rushing to get no drop. It was tough, but it's wasn't usually fun, I lost my share of good gear lol.

I played on rz/tz and sz. SZ was the hardest imo, what got me hooked on it was dinging lvl 6 and getting one shotted within 2 secs. I got a tell "welcome to sullon you fing noob" and knew i had found my server.

The massive pvp battles and corpse camping prevented sz from advancing in the pve realm, everyone who played on sz knew that if a big zone battle popped up that zone would be a war zone for hours or days.

To me, rz/tz was a walk in the park and boring.