Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Blue Server Chat (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   Are rangers worthless? (/forums/showthread.php?t=93810)

melkezidek 01-10-2013 11:09 AM

Love my ranger. Replacing my 60 epic monk with one.

Snagglepuss 01-10-2013 11:42 AM

I think the problem with rangers is that they are misclassified under DPS. Ranger in my mind has always been a "utility class" or the swiss army knife of EQ.

No, they aren't the best at anything, and you probably won't need one with a classical group set up of tank, healer, cc, dps, dps, dps, but as a utility class, they can fill the roll of others like a jack of all trades puller, tank, dps, cc, etc.

Hathes 01-10-2013 11:47 AM

they are not worthless, they are awesome tracker alts!

melkezidek 01-10-2013 11:49 AM

They actually still do good dps. Just a tad below a monk. Only thing they lack is a burst disc at this point.

agdros 01-10-2013 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snagglepuss (Post 808317)
...a "utility class" or the swiss army knife of EQ.

This.

This is what makes people play a ranger. You will never become bored with a ranger because you have the opportunity to "change jobs" very quickly depending on what is required.

Ele 01-10-2013 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raptur (Post 808323)
A class is only as good as the person playing, Unfortunately people on here have made rangers the crap class by assuming they have to eat the DT and are the most expendible class at the time. Baddys be bad bro.

Shamans eat DTs better.

Frogie305 01-10-2013 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ele (Post 808328)
Shamans eat DTs better.

This is True ... But yet Not True.. Let us Never Forget Drui Sacrifice in the field of battle.


11-12-2012 - Never forget...... Hurley- I Ran to Him! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_Pq0xYr3L4

http://www.project1999.org/forums/at...1&d=1352737113

Thulack 01-10-2013 12:23 PM

SSHHHH can we stop this thread before people actually realize how good rangers are. Ranger was main on live for 9 years. I played a rogue from classic til halfling rangers were created and then made Thulack. Best toon i ever had. Can do anything well enough to get by and does a few things exceptionally. What hurts them right now is the xp penatly. Once that goes in velious i'm sure there will be 100's of rangers running around because of their awesomeness.

Elements 01-10-2013 12:26 PM

Rangers are the best trackers. Rangers are often the best at pulling outdoors where they can harmony. Rangers are terrible at xp due to their penatly which is why everyone hates them since almost every group pre 60 is more concerned with xp than accomplishing a dungeon crawl or camping x mob for y loot. If yout not concerned with xp or at 60 your utility can make for an easier time taking a small duo or trio to camp specific mobs. On raids your basically just a warm body for dps with the occassional snare kite. The value of snare in dungeons also cant be understated.

Worthless? No. But there will be a better class to fill every role other than tracking and pulling outdoors.

SamwiseRed 01-10-2013 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thulack (Post 808353)
SSHHHH can we stop this thread before people actually realize how good rangers are. Ranger was main on live for 9 years. I played a rogue from classic til halfling rangers were created and then made Thulack. Best toon i ever had. Can do anything well enough to get by and does a few things exceptionally. What hurts them right now is the xp penatly. Once that goes in velious i'm sure there will be 100's of rangers running around because of their awesomeness.

ya man first toon i tried to make was halfing ranger :( too bad we will never reach that timeline because i think it was after velious


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.