Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Blue Server Chat (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   Makeleader not classic (/forums/showthread.php?t=117156)

Gadwen 08-03-2013 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 (Post 1059264)
When is someone going to find proof that training wasn't allowed in Veeshan's Peak?

"No CSR" did not mean training was allowed, just meant if your corpse wasn't recoverable GM's weren't going to assist you.

Has this been spoken about before on the forums?

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=97723

"GM Rule book from Kunark/ Velious - Limited CS Zones"

Thulack 08-03-2013 12:31 PM

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=88318

Randy 08-03-2013 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 (Post 1059153)
Imo ventrilo/voice chat is non classic too!
Shit ruins my immersion.

+1

Rhuma7 08-03-2013 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadwen (Post 1059373)
http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=97723

"GM Rule book from Kunark/ Velious - Limited CS Zones"

lim·it·ed
/ˈlimitid/
Adjective

Restricted in size, amount, or extent; few, small, or short: "a limited number of places are available".

no
/nō/
Adverb
Not at all; to no extent: "they were no more able to perform the task than I was".

Treefall 08-03-2013 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 (Post 1059153)
Imo ventrilo/voice chat is non classic too!
Shit ruins my immersion.

I don't know about you...but I used Roger Wilco back in the day...

Gadwen 08-03-2013 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhuma7 (Post 1059379)
lim·it·ed
/ˈlimitid/
Adjective

Restricted in size, amount, or extent; few, small, or short: "a limited number of places are available".

no
/nō/
Adverb
Not at all; to no extent: "they were no more able to perform the task than I was".

There weren't any "no CSR" zones on live

Rhuma7 08-03-2013 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadwen (Post 1059383)
There weren't any "no CSR" zones on live

That was my point, to an extent. P99 has adapted a NO CSR stance towards VP and this will be a real mother fucker in velious. Flurry drakes will destroy any raid.

I also don't understand the stance in general. They say they dont want to baby sit the top guilds, well, dont be a bunch of jealous assholes and train other guilds that beat you to an ecounter or were next in line after your wipe.

If you train a guild, you(the person who did it, not the guild) get suspended, do it again and get banned. I just don't see how big of a hassle it is when its pretty cut n dry. If any zone needed actual GM attention for training, logically I would think it would be end game raids and not training orcs in crushbone. The reality is, its completely ass backwards.

Tasslehofp99 08-03-2013 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey (Post 1059324)
There's a meta-game "NerfQuest", much like ForumQuest, being played here where people feast on everyone's tears when they can find something like /makeleader to nerf "to classic" when we have some incorrect interpretation of classic "no CSR" zones being perverted into "trains are okay" that isn't classic and are game-ruining for everyone but one guild.

Yes!

xarzzardorn 08-03-2013 01:28 PM

young lawyering for "no csr" changes isnt going to work because the staff have decide to have it that way for reasons other than "most classic". the policy for velious probably hasn't been finalized

sulpher01 08-03-2013 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey (Post 1059324)
There's a meta-game "NerfQuest", much like ForumQuest, being played here where people feast on everyone's tears when they can find something like /makeleader to nerf "to classic" when we have some incorrect interpretation of classic "no CSR" zones being perverted into "trains are okay" that isn't classic and are game-ruining for everyone but one guild.

<3


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.