maerilith |
01-17-2017 03:01 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedmelon
(Post 2446183)
Best solution to matters of civil liberty is law. Yeah, we got off course with laws for a while, but we fixed that in 1964. What we need is for government to mandate where people live, but not so completely that it interferes with people's choices. What we could do is have a national housing database.
We wouldn't want it to be too inefficient so it would be good to keep with the states and local municipalities, but ultimately other locations would need access to the info and local governments can't be relied upon to act in the best interest of other unrelated local governments, so ultimately it would have to be federally managed
Then people could just submit applications for where they wanted to live and the government would match them with the closest openings based on their ethnicity so that we could make sure there was no segregation and every square mile of developed space was properly balanced between penis and vagina and black and white and yellow and brown.
Not everyone can afford to live where they want though and sometimes you end up with a situation where one area is becoming overly saturated with a particular group, so we'd need some form of government assistance to help people's relocate to more diverse areas. That cost would be shared between the recipient, the locality they are leaving, the one they are moving to and the federal government.
|
That's a bad idea and the part of progressive affirmative action that I don't agree with.
You can't fix the south with liberal shenanigans like that. It won't save anyone or anything because we can't make people get along or treat other people fairly. Or do their part.
The best we can do is ensure that someone has a fair chance with education, employment, and criminal justice regardless of who or what they are or have in common / difference.
Ppl should be fired / hired based on merits and work ethic. Not ethnicity, religion, or what's on their bedsheets. Or which waifu they are married to.
The government shouldn't elevate one group over another. Or allow our collective efforts to be exploited by any group or in support of any specific ideological point of view.
Enforcing intelligent behavior can be wasteful though :(
Obama tried and while we made some progress, we ended up with a situation where people based on conspiracy and emotional distress aren't willing to work within their social contracts.
|