Project 1999 - The Reptilian RL Iksar Thread!

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)

- Off Topic (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)

- - The Reptilian RL Iksar Thread! (/forums/showthread.php?t=144257)

Jim Carrey

http://s25.postimg.org/6mdpbe1an/Rep...tors_Inter.jpg

The Matrix: Keanu Reeves' Claw

http://s25.postimg.org/43s0apfkf/Kea...e_Seen_Yet.jpg

These images are genuine, they don't need to be 1080p for them to be real. If you think it's photoshopped, watch the actual Matrix movie and go to that scene, you can find the proof you're looking for that way too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrooge (Post 1380032)

These images are genuine, they don't need to be 1080p for them to be real.

If these things are really happening, why has it not been captured in HD, given the amount of HD footage we have on the internet, and how common HD video is. It's not logical man, i hope you're trolling at this point.

Still waiting on high res evidence, in the mean time please stop posting.

I'm simply passing on existing information, whether you want to believe it or not isn't my problem. These things are everywhere not just the entertainment industry, it's just easier to spot on celebrities and newscasts. If you don't like the content then don't look, if you want better evidence - feel free to find it yourself.

As far as the quality of the videos themselves, I've asked certain parties which produce some of these videos, if it's possible to get them in better resolution. It all comes down to the fact that through the many transfers and edits of videos, not to mention YouTube itself, all keep lowering the quality of the original. Much like back during the VCR era, when making copies of copies of VHS tapes, would result in worse quality than the original.

If I see there's enough interest in this subject through this thread, I'll post much more detailed evidence.

This was my question to one of the producers, and the answer I received:

Q: Is it possible to catch these 'things' with a higher resolution, especially the hosts? Would be great to see all this in better detail in some of your older videos, like the "host compilations" for example. Sometimes it's really hard to make anything out with it being too blurry or cause of the scanlines off a TV set.

A: Nope, most are slowed down or playing videos. Unfortunately it is HD, but the places where I download movies; Vudu, Netflix, etc., soften the picture and then the editors will mess with them as well and then Youtube lowers quality during download. Nobody focuses on host or snakes like I do. most are slits, skin, shifts..as far as i know. I used the tv as my source in the beginning but because of those issues I switched to computer. I cant do better, maybe a different camera, but I spend money downloading movies, I cannot afford expensive camera. Sorry. I plan on doing grease again off computer because everyone of them showed the host alot.

The burden of proof is on you to provide better evidence as you're the one making the claim.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrooge (Post 1380552)

Well actually, you are coming on here and making a claim. You have skeptics and you keep replying to the skeptics by posting more "proof." If anything, it does seem to be your problem whether or not people believe you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrooge (Post 1380552)

If I see there's enough interest in this subject through this thread, I'll post much more detailed evidence.

So basically, you will only post the "real" and more "detailed" evidence once people start agreeing with you? That seems silly. If you want to convince people, then convince people - if you want it to be a circle jerk, then go post gifs on RnF.

I'm sure if there were enough footage of anyone, including the OP and Scrooge, then you could take that footage and slow it down and find the same "evidence" that you have posted here. Video cameras do not work like the human eye. They simulate moving images. There will always be aberrations in photos and videos. This is not proof of some horribly weak and insane conspiracy. Sorry.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenzig (Post 1381492)

My thoughts. I see a lot of interlace, compression, digitization, overexposure etc... An HD image at X FPS is just that... many images, some are not high quality. Others are crisper. Just because it shows 1080 lines, doesn't even mean the image/lense/recorder was good enough to do that or there isn't interpolation going on.

A raw video file of any decent lenght at max digital recording resolution would be huge - to big for 10 blueray discs to hold. A 10 megapixel image would be 15,0 MB for one still image. Multiply that by thousands (frames) ... 900mb file for a 1 minute video at 1 fps... multiply that by 60 and you then have a 52gb file at 60fps for 1 minute.

Naw. Even high quality movies are horribly lossy. And no were near as good as the human eye either.

Not to mention richer more complex color data requires more bits per pixel. It's kinda silly to try to do "science" off blueray quality evidence of this kind of phenomenon. Unless perhaps someone has a good explanation for why the images are, or are not - math, science about recording/light/digitization to back up their claims. None of which has been presented.

http://web.forret.com/tools/megapixe...48&height=2736

I can think of a lot of better ways to gather evidence. I'm surprised none have turned up in war as corpses. Or that none have shown themselves on an operating table after a trauma. Which would be enough to bring out the "host" you speak of.

One theory I could accept is that when people engage deeply and primarily in their lower brain stem functions that we take on a "reptilian" posture, or pose, or movement, or we eye scan like a reptile might. Morphology is not the word for this. But it would be an interesting study. For example if we are experiencing reality primarily through lower brain stem functions in a time of stress or trauma we might claw (or most likely bite) like a lizard instead of punch or grasp like a primate.