Project 1999 - Best 4 person all caster/priest group

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)

- Green Server Chat (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=73)

- - Best 4 person all caster/priest group (/forums/showthread.php?t=406923)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimjam (Post 3692646)

I don’t think I could give a definition to the term ‘pocket character’ that fully describes what is being talked about.

Oh that is easy. It was defined before, and the definition is supported by people doing this same pattern of behavior for years.

Pocket characters are characters that are purposely created to be shared between players. They are minimally geared and leveled to provide the utility needed. You typically do not share account information for your main/alt characters, because you don't want people masquerading as you main characters, or destroying/stealing your items.

A level 55 coth mage, 49 cleric, 44 Duid/Wizard are all examples of pocket characters. Dial a port has quite a few pocket druids/wizards. Plenty of guilds have pocket clerics and mages.

In the words of Crede:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crede (Post 3610378)

Level a cleric and have people log it in as needed. I have an epic cleric that’s been 54 since 2014 and he has done countless rezzes. Just a phenomenal class that everyone should have at least one of.

---

Quote:

Originally Posted by Troxx (Post 3692655)

Correct

At work. Will continue my read-through when I find the time. Currently page 307 and literally 98% of it so far is DSM arguing the same thing to the same people without saying new things

Troxx didn't read this last post:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=5517

It is part of a clear pattern of behavior where he ignores posts that disproves what he's said. His delusional summary is further proof of this. He would rather spam the thread with nonsense than address the arguments. He will waste his time summarizing the whole thread incorrectly, and have nothing to show for it. He'll just be adding more evidence to the post history that he is a troll.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/Xcuh3...=200w.gif&ct=g

Quote:

Said Crede … not in the context of this thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Troxx (Post 3692662)

Said Crede … not in the context of this thread.

The context of this thread allows pocket characters. You admitted you have no objective evidence that supports the no pocket character restriction. You admitted you made it up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist (Post 3692663)

The context of this thread allows pocket characters. You admitted you have no objective evidence that supports the no pocket character restriction. You admitted you made it up.

did you just assume my pocket allowance?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist (Post 3692660)

ignores posts that disproves what he's said

I wonder where I've seen that behavior before... hehe. :)

How about a pocket shaman to malo, because that's about the only useful spell they cast for an all caster group?

Then you get to keep the cleric that can cast useful spells around.

got er'thang pocketed so bigly i just swap chars the entire time im playing with my hypothetical all caster group

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keebz (Post 3692671)

How about a pocket shaman to malo, because that's about the only useful spell they cast for an all caster group?

Then you get to keep the cleric that can cast useful spells around.

That's easy. You'd need to level the Shaman to 60 to get Malo. You don't need to level the Cleric to 60 for res and CH. You only need to get to 49.

If something happens to a level 49 Cleric in a shared account, you lose a lot less than a shared account with a 60 Torpor shaman. Especially now with the slow reimbursements.

You are also incorrect about Malo being just about a Shaman's only useful spell.