33 players right now. Granted it's also 1:17 EST on a Thursday. How is it on weekends? And are there guilds killing bosses?

http://puu.sh/kmEHb/b78217645c.png

http://puu.sh/kmEJh/e197971f31.png

Both servers are clearing raid content with the small amounts of players.

Personally? I have a job and couldn't give a shit which one is more popular. Have fun determining which elf sim is better than the other. I'll keep on preserving EQMac.

It's not a very good history lesson if don't explain how they got there :eek:

So Secrets, then tell me. Why do Torven or you or Haynar feel the need to rehash this every few weeks? Like I have said, the developers of P2002 do NOT come to the TAK thread and try to stir up trouble. Once again, Haynar came in this thread and posted a bunch of bullshit. Everyone can see that this hostility is mainly initiated from your side. It is pretty sad that the two of you have to abuse your notoriety on this forum to try to shift opinions. At least when Torven comes in here and spreads crap nobody give's a rats ass

Just so you know we basically have the same code base except for the loot fix you blights out in. We adjusted drop values to fix the same issue.

We also do not use the login server speedz created that tied the salt login to the database, which leaves a huge security hole.

**note I'm not a code dev this was just how it was explained to me

According to the topic history that I see,

http://puu.sh/kmFKp/f1c60feaed.png

it was unprovoked and someone asked Haynar when he started playing on P2002, with several P2002 'developers' chiming in.

Neither do we.

If you're using the same code as us, then your database isn't matching our formulas according to your allaclone. You may wish to run a query to update stats of NPCs globally to match TAKP's for a better playing experience.

rofl did you even read his post? Guess you were too busy screenshotting it and uploading it to the internet.

Oh, and we get it, you now have a job and a big screen. Everyone knows by now ;)

you're both wrong, furst was responding to a deleted haynar post - nothing sinister, i think he wanted to write something longer which he did

Haynar abusing his Mod powers once again.