I wonder what would have been if we had stayed out of Syria all together.

Anyone law find themselves overcome with happiness reading Trump's comment on China's seizure of the US water drone? I get all warm inside and just can't keep th skip off my face ^^

Lots people laughing at how irresponsible / absurd it is, but it really is the right approach and for Trump, well it is more instinctual than cunning.

literally the most lucrative and intelligent decision an american can make right now is to do exactly this, you're about to be able to get rich quicker as a totally inexperienced one of these than as a a house flipper 7 years ago.

Legit going to make an attempt at it. Got my adderrall straightened out and Im rdy 2 hit the books again.

Its difficult to rebuild an aptitude for learning once you have lost interest in learning for a longer period of time, but its entirely possible with chemical stimulation.

This is one instance where meditation (COUGH* skarlorn * COUGH*) would in all likelihood, not be very helpful.

Chemically simulated interest in what amount to mundane subjects is the only way to go.

Tech boom in SF over lobby boom in DC hasnt even gotten started shits about to get real. Money for literally anyone willing to cold call ppl and setup meetings.

Gee I wonder if Putin had a beef against Hillary because she has continually threatened to go to war via cyber, indirect and direct military aggression.

Personally I don't believe for a second that Putin prefers Trump over Hillary. Trump will smile at Putin via video conference while he is hand signalling to his generals to crush him. He knows this. With Hillary any conflict would have been scripted and telegraphed for predetermined outcomes. Trump is playing 4d chess and Putin wouldn't stand a chance.

Anyone that thinks Putin prefers Trump is kidding themselves, thought Hillary was going to win the election, and probably still thinks there are WMDs in Iraq.

I'm sorry, I am dumb, what is 4d chess? :c

That is actually quite an interesting question and possibly a fallacy.

Most people think of "2d chess" as a puzzle game made up of length and height(?) dimensions... 8x8 board 32 pieces.... Upon a closer inspection however there are many more dimensions in a standard "2d chess" game.

Garry Kasparov speaks of chess in terms of time space and material... with time already a natural force or dimension of "2d chess" layering more dimensions on top of it exponentially increases the complications...

arguably? the 4th dimension IS time or spacetime? so can a 4d-chess actually exist? or does it already exist inside "2d chess"...

Learn to counterattack in chess || Art of Learning lesson 10 || Rudolf Spielmann vs Paul Keres

don't think i explained it as well as I could... still need to look up more references...

most people when they say 4d chess are simply saying how deeply and broadly and intricately detailed a thought or thought process can be...

maybe time-influenced-3d-matrix-transforms is a better way to explain it...

No one answered and I am legit curious