Why did this thread get closed?
 

I think that most threads should be bombed in this sub forum but why did this one get closed? https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...394387&page=80

Just wondering to stay on the right side of the law.

take a guess

I assume it was because Republicans are dangerous morons.

I legitimately don't know. That thread and like half of the active threads in this forum cross most lines so I was wondering if there was something about it that made it need to end.

I assumed it was because the case is done

Now it's a question of whether Kyle is going to take these news agencies to task over spreading falsehoods about the case, such as him being a white supremacist or that he arrived and just started shooting "protestors"

Kyle seems like a nice dude, and his lawyer said he is going to change his name (won't help, he'll have to switch to online school if he doesn't want drinks dumped on him by psycho Dems on ASU campus), so I wouldn't be surprised if he chooses not to sue news agencies for slander. And that would be a shame because they need to be taught a lesson and the best lessons are those that hit the wallet

It brings up talk like "I can now travel to your town with an assault rifle and police your streets. If you dont like my loitering and menacing, touch me and its self defense if i shoot you" and on and on.

Cause the provocation wasnt bringing an assault rifle to "protect" property you dont even own, lol.. not at all.

I thought right wingers hated "outside agitators" and stuff..

Forum Rules: Case Closed = Thread Closed

I already announced the final verdict.

I think it was so people can't pick fights digging up quotes.

lol wut

I actually just found out when having dinner with my grandma who also called Kyle foolish for doing what he did, that someone actually ASKED Kyle to defend their used car lot due to it already having been vandalized in a previous riot

Now I'm wondering how an ADULT asking a 17yr old kid to grab a gun and protect his property isn't considered contributing to delinquency of a minor. I guess because it's not a crime to protect property, but in doing so the adult just requested the kid put his life in danger