Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Time for some reconditioning. (/forums/showthread.php?t=402663)

starkind 05-06-2022 06:03 PM

Time for some reconditioning.
 


Granted crazies still go to comfy hospitals with organic whole foods villages.

The cool pretty ppl and disabled get their xboxes powered ! Not by sterile men. By real nukefactories!
:o

bomaroast 05-06-2022 06:08 PM

Yes, leaving traps for any future civilizations is a good idea.

starkind 05-06-2022 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bomaroast (Post 3456586)
Yes, leaving traps for any future civilizations is a good idea.

Did you watch the video even?

bomaroast 05-06-2022 06:24 PM

Ya, "its not so bad" video is wrong. I learned as a young man working in a wood shop to not set traps for myself. It's a good thing to grok. That and entropy.

If we need reconditioning, it needs to be about accepting low-energy lifestyles again. The horse and the hand-tool will reign again, presuming humanity and horses survive that long.

starkind 05-06-2022 06:41 PM

Why not do both.


The private storage method he illustrates won't be a trap. Any new civs will never reach them within their hazardous decay period. Absolutely no way. They take up very little space we can still live underground directly above them and it would be pretty safe even if we boiled off the atmosphere and only lived underground cracking hydrogen oxygen and carbon from rocks and sipping algae and recycling our poop and pee. We could probably grow to 10 billion that way.

It's literally the safest way to get the energy to do that. Even if we did it on an incredibly massive scale. It would still only be a tiny fraction of the bad we are doing now.

Where they drill down super deep and slide it in tubes. The amount of waste is still ultra miniscule.

You could even live in a facility next to it if you had too and it would be a million times safer than living nexto a coal plant. And natgas while less toxic is really bad cuz methane.

MrSparkle001 05-06-2022 06:43 PM

Why not rocket the waste into the sun?

starkind 05-06-2022 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrSparkle001 (Post 3456612)
Why not rocket the waste into the sun?

Another person who TLDW.

Rockets blow up. Miss space. Fall back to earth. Etc.

Watch the video guys plz. B4 u get super critical!

It's even super safe during transport and staging. Unless you hit them with like nuclear missiles and well.. the waste isn't going to be a big deal than.
⚠️

bomaroast 05-06-2022 06:47 PM

I watched the video, dumbass. It's just wrong. If you can grok entropy, then you'll understand.

starkind 05-06-2022 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bomaroast (Post 3456614)
I watched the video, dumbass. It's just wrong. If you can grok entropy, then you'll understand.

The radiation decays before the containment could ever be breached. Maybe like a Theia level impact happens...then you're better off on Mars or Venus.

Even an apophis impact or pole shift wouldn't cause containment breach. Unless it was a direct impact which would be nbd from a residual radiation standpoint. Still less radiation than a coal power plant.

And 999999999999999999.9999999999999 forever percent chance all containment stays contained. Safely. Till its just non isotopic rock.

Jibartik 05-06-2022 07:32 PM

hopefully we get a few cities nuked paid for by the money spent on Russian oil then the libtards won’t be able to say nuke waste is less radioactive than oil anymore.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.