Project 1999
Page 4 of 8 « First 23 4 56 Last »
Show 10 post(s) from this thread on one page

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Rants and Flames (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   NSFW Not Safe For World - Shock and Awe? (/forums/showthread.php?t=159492)

Lune 07-29-2014 03:57 PM
In other news, the United States supports Saudi Arabia as a friend and ally, a country which has branded atheistic beliefs as terrorism.

Imagine if the US classified Muslim beliefs as terrorism.

DeruIsLove 07-29-2014 03:58 PM
DB get off the opiates.

Dragonsblood1987 07-29-2014 04:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lune (Post 1554964)

Imagine if the US classified Muslim beliefs as terrorism.
it kind of has, just not officially. but it isnt americas business to worry about what saudi laws (or any other countrys laws) are, or what they view as immoral.

Glenzig 07-29-2014 04:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeruIsLove (Post 1554906)
Logic and religious extremists do not being in the same sentence. Not a real hard or deep concept.
Ok. So that's the same reasoning that they use though isn't it?

pufen 07-29-2014 04:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsblood1987 (Post 1554750)
wow youre pretty fucking stupid lol. it doesnt have to do with the fact that we've been fucking every muslim country for decades. theyre just mad cos allah, right?
http://i.imgur.com/os5sf4J.jpg

Dragonsblood1987 07-29-2014 04:22 PM
god damn now YOURE trying to come out to me too? maybe you and prolapse should message each other. hes been looking for a date recently.

Yumyums Inmahtumtums 07-29-2014 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lune (Post 1554951)
Umayyad
?

Yumyums Inmahtumtums 07-29-2014 04:37 PM
I'm mad

DeruIsLove 07-29-2014 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenzig (Post 1554979)
Ok. So that's the same reasoning that they use though isn't it?
No, not at all. Stop trying to assert that it is.

Glenzig 07-29-2014 04:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeruIsLove (Post 1555031)
No, not at all. Stop trying to assert that it is.
Its not? I thought that they, from their point of view, were righteous in killing anyone who is worsening the world from their point of view. They are of course not justified in this, but I'm wondering how it would be justifiable to use the same reasoning to do away with them? I'm not asserting anything btw. It just is what it is.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM.
Page 4 of 8 « First 23 4 56 Last »
Show 10 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.