How I want to deal w/ ISIL
 

In my opinion all prisoners are more than likely dead anyhow already. So state that to them, then warn all citizens to GTFO or to bad so sad. Then promptly state any and all radical religious based militants ( not just Islamists ) will be treated as a warring nation and kill them all. Sick of this shit. :mad:

http://cdnimg.visualizeus.com/thumbs...14d45593_m.jpg

Need a new president for any of your opinions to be so.

He would rather talk to them to death and draw imaginary lines in the ground and talk about not putting the horse before the cart.

Wish we had a real life "Mitch Rapp" we could sick on the leader's ass.

wut wud Mitt Romney do?

I watched the Sotloff beheading video before they yanked it from youtube. Those vicious, evil fucks need to be completely wiped out. It's a pity we don't have a president who gives a fuck. And now it's out in the open that he's been briefed on ISIS daily for at least a year and didn't do anything but dismiss them publically by referring to them as "JV". What a fucking liar.

So now the ISIS bastards are wreaking havoc in Iraq (after having their way with Syria), undoing everything our military did there and making it so our troops died in vain. In my eyes he's a complete and utter failure as a leader and the longer he tries to avoid dealing with it the more he puts us all in danger.

He knows he's not up for another term etc, its the same shit show every time... and all the senators etc fall in line because of dem lucrative arms deals going on.

Meanwhile the US (and EU pals) really shouldn't be trying to destabilize Ukraine/Russia. Maybe they want World War 3.

Oh neat. You stopped sucking dicks long enough to respond. Thx! Now you better get back to it. A homo manwhore's job is never done. :)

You know they are just trying to provoke us into expending more resources on them, right?

Nothing brings a band of durka-jihads more street cred than getting the USA on your ass. Recruitment would swell, and their (suffering) reputation among the arab world would increase. They also know that as soon as the USA shows up, all they have to do is put away their "uniforms" and flags, blend in with civilians, and they can't be touched. Meanwhile, we're spending billions of dollars on a useless occupation while they exert a cursory effort inflicting casualties with IED's, etc.

This is exactly why the terrorists are winning the 'War on Terror'. Until Obama, we've done everything they wanted us to do. We got bogged down in an extremely expensive and useless war in Afghanistan, and an equally useless occupation in Iraq which had the added effect of toppling Saddam, creating a power vacuum that allowed groups like ISIS to flourish. All while our economy and standard of living floundered.

Obama has been more reluctant to be provoked, opting instead to use black ops and his trusty drone swarm to violate the sovereignty of those countries who are either unwilling or incapable of controlling terror groups operating in their borders (Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia, Libya). Retards like to interpret this kind of foreign policy as indecisiveness or 'being a pussy'. If not being a pussy means you manage foreign policy like G.W Bush, I'd rather be a pussy. Sometimes the best action is just to stand by and wait for better conditions/opportunities, instead of making harmful emotional decisions.

Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if some day, perhaps 100 years from now, it comes down to genocidal extermination of fundamentalist Muslims. They would be doing it to us right now if they could. All it would take is a really, really bad terrorist attack, such as a nuclear device, and suddenly the kind and gentle "Don't kill civilians!" NATO would go Nazi on their asses.

wow, hurb, must be the first good post of yours i've seen

also, naw, taliban had to be ousted. same with saddam, we helped that fat unoriginal bitch out and he goes and starts trading oil in fucking euros? naw!