Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Trump henchman charged with battery (/forums/showthread.php?t=233112)

Blitzers 03-29-2016 12:06 PM

Trump henchman charged with battery
 
After denying claims that Corey Lewandowsky grabbed a female Breitbart reporter, new video emerged today. The new video has led to battery charges against Lewandowsky by local police.

http://www.bustle.com/articles/15072...battery-report

I'm sure it was his stunt double or a clone.

And I have never heard or read bustle b4 no clue who fuck they are.

Pokesan 03-29-2016 12:15 PM

it was a false flag

barrettdc1 03-29-2016 12:42 PM

LOL U READ BUSTLE, WHAT A FAG

Blitzers 03-29-2016 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pokesan (Post 2226808)
it was a false flag

Please enlighten us how, I wanna hear this BS.

Pokesan 03-29-2016 01:34 PM

their all crisis actors you sheeple

Blitzers 03-29-2016 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pokesan (Post 2226867)
their all crisis actors you sheeple

Man assaults woman.
Woman has bruises to prove it.
Man denies.
Video released proves man assaulted woman.
Man still denies.

Man - Sounds like a Trump sheep to me.

Let's not forget Trump is denying this too even after seeing the video.

AzzarTheGod 03-29-2016 04:23 PM

Just a little hassling.

The victim went to the police and filed an affidavit. Big deal. Anyone can do that and exaggerate a situation to make it criminal.

I have personal experience in the court system and life experience many nerds won't see, and I'll tell you this means fuckall.

No matter how hard the prosecutor wants to prosecute, its a bluff. He will NOT go to trial on "he said, she said". As long as the perpetrator didn't offer a version of events where he touched her. Its important that he lied also, and admitted to NO GRABBING of any kind.

As long as his statement to police is also stretching the truth, you can't prosecute because both sides can't agree on anything. The #1 investigative Q that police investigators ask is rephrased watered down versions of events to try to make you feel comfortable about admitting to something. As long as you strongly buck their watered-down seemingly friendly characterization of events (I.E. "So pal, you touched her maybe with an elbow you think? Just a little incidental contact right, no big deal." And say nope, did not make contact with her, she made contact with me (lawyer speak) You're good.

His face made contact with my fist is legalese. Same with someone who strikes pedestrians, you would never use the word "hit" or "touch". You would say "my car came into contact with X" str8 from an attourney pals.

iruinedyourday 03-29-2016 04:35 PM

http://i.imgur.com/VSX2czh.jpg

AzzarTheGod 03-29-2016 04:37 PM

pic offends my sensibilities, but lol'd neway.

iruinedyourday 03-29-2016 04:37 PM

hehe


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.