Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Nasa television iss (/forums/showthread.php?t=252306)

entruil 09-05-2016 11:20 AM

Nasa television iss
 
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html#iss

http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/watch-live-as-nasa-astronaut-two-crewmates-return-to-earth(tomorrow)

R Flair 09-05-2016 12:52 PM

What cracks me up about this is that they could live stream a trip to the moon or mars and virtually pay for the entire thing in ad revenue. If they were actually capable of such a thing...

skarlorn 09-05-2016 01:21 PM

They have already been to the moon

Rhambuk 09-05-2016 02:17 PM

Who?! Mooninites?

AzzarTheGod 09-05-2016 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R Flair (Post 2353297)
What cracks me up about this is that they could live stream a trip to the moon or mars and virtually pay for the entire thing in ad revenue. If they were actually capable of such a thing...

The dunks. +1 to Rick.

Daywolf 09-05-2016 06:04 PM

Well whether or not they mooned in that past, and I do believe they did, they cant now, yes.

What's this thread about? ?

entruil 09-05-2016 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daywolf (Post 2353618)
What's this thread about? ?

not really sure... i think it was inspired by hermine and trusting nasa and then a general spontaneous lack of motivation ... meh

should of asked for some neat random global live images....

R Flair 09-05-2016 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daywolf (Post 2353618)
Well whether or not they mooned in that past, and I do believe they did, they cant now, yes.

What's this thread about? ?

Ya, cuz technology is harder for us today than it was 60 years ago. :rolleyes:

AzzarTheGod 09-05-2016 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R Flair (Post 2353625)
Ya, cuz technology is harder for us today than it was 60 years ago. :rolleyes:

Lol double dunked.

Daywolf 09-05-2016 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R Flair (Post 2353625)
Ya, cuz technology is harder for us today than it was 60 years ago. :rolleyes:

Yeah, it's more frail. Just look at the Abrams tank for example, a few starts and it practically needs to be rebuilt. Our tech is very problematic, very susceptible to the damaging whims of environmental conditions. That while the old tech still endures, such as voyager 1 having entered interstellar space and still operating.

We do things differently say compared to the Russians as an example, which their design tech is usually minimalist. So example their guns and their fighter jets continue to operate while ours break down and require maintenance. We have excellent performance statistics, but what good is that in space when it turns into space junk because there is no factory nearby to make replacement parts?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.