Project 1999 - Necro solo

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)

- Blue Server Chat (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=17)

- - Necro solo (/forums/showthread.php?t=31321)

What have people found to be the best place to solo @ 51 kunark/old content. I am looking for a good soloing place that requires minimum buffs and lower chance of death. I do not have splurt yet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wotsirb401 (Post 252268)

What have people found to be the best place to solo @ 51 kunark/old content. I am looking for a good soloing place that requires minimum buffs and lower chance of death. I do not have splurt yet.

Dreadlands. Anything blue, east or south side. East side has beneficial pathing for fear kiting.

City of Mist. Undead Mobs = win.

Guk is pretty empty these days.... has the same DB/LB mobs as Dreadlands, but a better ZEM and better loot.

Lowerguk, Seafuries, DL

All good exp at 51.

What has a better exp modifier? CoM or Lguk, seafuries

Let me help you help yourself:

1) Follow the link: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=eqmacwiki+zone+experience+modifier
2) Click the first link.
3) Sort the table by highest-lowest in the Modifier column (the first column).
4) ???
5) Profit.

Quote:

Originally Posted by falkun (Post 252407)

I believe the GM's stated they will not let the zem % out.

Not the same as live. This i am sure of.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seaweedpimp (Post 252413)

I believe the GM's stated they will not let the zem % out.

Not the same as live. This i am sure of.

Within the Library tab is a post called "Project 1999 F.A.Q." by Pyrocat, which links to a ZEM post by Tirooph. Using a little math to change the EQMacWiki ZEM page from "base exp mod" of 75 to a base exp mod of 100, you will end up with ZEM values that match those linked to in Tirooph's ZEM post.

Tirooph has this caveat on his post:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tirooph (Post 3977)

Anyway, here is an experience modifier table from PEQ's databse.
From my experience, that's seems to be the most accurate, so I'm pretty sure this is it.
So unless Project 1999's team have changed it, this should be like this:

You are correct that the GM's (or probably more accurately developers) have not released ZEM % information, which makes Tirooph's post/EQMacWiki the most accurate compiled list. If you would like to argue the accuracy of their lists, I wish you luck on your experiment and eagerly await for updated results on the ZEM topic. However, until such experimentation has been conducted or values have been datamined, these lists are the most accurate of their kind and as such should be regarded as valid.

Quote:

Originally Posted by falkun (Post 252451)

Within the Library tab is a post called "Project 1999 F.A.Q." by Pyrocat, which links to a ZEM post by Tirooph.

Then why didn't you post this first to begin with instead of being a dick?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChairmanMauzer (Post 252617)

Then why didn't you post this first to begin with instead of being a dick?

I skipped the posted list and went straight for the more user-friendly version. Also, Tirooph's list does not include CoM, and the OP would like to compare that ZEM to LGuk's.

If you don't like my responses, you are more than welcome to do your own googling/web browsing on your own. But if you want me to hold your hand, then don't get pissed off when I hold your hand. Finally, if you don't like my format, I suggest you step back, calm down, and watch some South Park.