There is very little difference between--
 

--abortion for economic reasons, and eugenics or genocide of less desirable people in a society.

Its immoral to not let people enter the country illegally, but its not to cremate babies so they wont have an impact on a young persons finances.

Excuse me?

but dead babies make good cosmetics tho

It's true, baby blood infusions actually make you physically stronger and boost your immunity and clear up your skin. Its a sick practice but it's been happening in hollywood.

What is wrong with someone setting up a government program where babies destroyed for economic reasons's blood is given to the less fortunate and suffering from sicknesses via state run healthcare.

Oh wait I forgot, we turned the people who were less fortunate into dust at crematorium center #14

What is wrong with someone setting up a government program where babies destroyed for economic reasons's blood is given to the members of our progressive utopian society.

We aren't killing enough people mick, William Shatner put it pretty good in 08. Starvation and retardation are natures way of dealing with a population that has lost its apex predator.

Ya'll need to get woke and get real. Eugenics is the only way to go, fuck em if they are babies or old men, I don't care.

If you get euthanized, it's your fault.

tapeworm lives matter

Progressive policy in 2039:

AOC says "its best for us all if you destroy your baby, so we will give you $5000 welfare infusion if you do, because overpopulation is causing unrecoverable damage to our planet."

Cost cutting is good. Not feeding tapeworms == good. We should be building bombs, not babies.

I'm being euthanized slowly.

People say to me, "Here's a fun video game and some Netflix. Do you like McDonald's? Eat eat! You don't need to do anything. Consume!"

Then behind my back they wring their hands and smile devilishly, "The boy is useless and will amount to nothing. He might as well not exist!"