Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Rants and Flames (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   Can't we all just agree on one thing? (/forums/showthread.php?t=348661)

Polycaster 01-30-2020 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horza (Post 3077120)
Teppler always links us to the most entertaining antisemitic propaganda.


Nothing is mentioned of jews, only gay execs who require sexual favors. It would seem to be you are the anti-Semite for assuming that type of behavior is synonymous with them. Although in your defense, recent news stories did seem to back that up, as even some jews noticed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0eeNijdv3I

I take it as a compliment when you refer to me as Teppler, as he was brilliant. I still enjoy thinking about how a smart guy pretended to be dumb in order to troll dumb people pretending to be smart got inside your heads to such a degree. He's been living in your heads rent-free, and I hope to some day replicate that. Perhaps in a few months you'll be accusing everyone who disagrees with you of being Polycaster. I dare to dream of that day.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sethius Marlowe (Post 3077125)
This is fascinating. Can you teach us more about these pillars?


Read the book. I know that is hard for you shitlibs as the danger of learning something that goes against your beliefs is large.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellybuttface (Post 3077137)
Ironic that Polycaster/Teppler uses a government link to prove a point, yet goes on ad nauseaum about how the government is lying to us.

Laughable that you think your 'common sense' is so advanced that it can allow you to discount scientific consensus and expertise. Your brain is saturated with anti-liberal Alex Jones-esque conspiracy theories, and you simply parrot nonsense you gobble up from your "sources" and regurgitate it out here expecting us to believe you have an ounce of your own thought process in the equation.

Still have no idea why you think you're a "real American."

I use gov sources because I'm not trying to prove something to myself, I have other sources for that. I use sources that I think the audience will find persuasive. It shouldn't be so shocking to me that I have to explain this, as I know that actual debate and rational argument are anathema to shitlibs such as yourself. Yet somehow it is. You all constantly amaze me with your ignorant claims to knowledge.

We've already done the AGW thing. Recap: I post evidence that the metrics and methodology of studies X,Y,Z are flawed, thereby disproving the 97% consensus claim. The only attempt at using data to disprove that was to cite those very same studies that claim there is a 97% consensus... One of the more relevant pieces of info was that individual scientists that were supposedly amongst the 97% came forward to say they were not amongst the 97%. You can't get much more debunked than that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horza (Post 3077168)


The levels to which you people use AJ as a way to discount valid information is itself a conspiracy theory worthy of AJ. You have no arguments, only ad hominem, strawmen, and non sequiturs.

One of my favorite AJ videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGAAhzreGWw

Pretzelle 01-30-2020 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polycaster (Post 3077194)
Nothing is mentioned of jews, only gay execs who require sexual favors. It would seem to be you are the anti-Semite for assuming that type of behavior is synonymous with them. Although in your defense, recent news stories did seem to back that up, as even some jews noticed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0eeNijdv3I

I take it as a compliment when you refer to me as Teppler, as he was brilliant. I still enjoy thinking about how a smart guy pretended to be dumb in order to troll dumb people pretending to be smart got inside your heads to such a degree. He's been living in your heads rent-free, and I hope to some day replicate that. Perhaps in a few months you'll be accusing everyone who disagrees with you of being Polycaster. I dare to dream of that day.




Read the book. I know that is hard for you shitlibs as the danger of learning something that goes against your beliefs is large.




I use gov sources because I'm not trying to prove something to myself, I have other sources for that. I use sources that I think the audience will find persuasive. It shouldn't be so shocking to me that I have to explain this, as I know that actual debate and rational argument are anathema to shitlibs such as yourself. Yet somehow it is. You all constantly amaze me with your ignorant claims to knowledge.

We've already done the AGW thing. Recap: I post evidence that the metrics and methodology of studies X,Y,Z are flawed, thereby disproving the 97% consensus claim. The only attempt at using data to disprove that was to cite those very same studies that claim there is a 97% consensus... One of the more relevant pieces of info was that individual scientists that were supposedly amongst the 97% came forward to say they were not amongst the 97%. You can't get much more debunked than that.




The levels to which you people use AJ as a way to discount valid information is itself a conspiracy theory worthy of AJ. You have no arguments, only ad hominem, strawmen, and non sequiturs.

One of my favorite AJ videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGAAhzreGWw

https://i.imgur.com/3vDbEuN.png

Wonkie 01-30-2020 04:06 PM

Oh r-k theory

Ok ya got me ��

Hyppon 01-30-2020 04:07 PM

Quote:

You have no arguments, only ad hominem, strawmen, and non sequiturs.

Horza 01-30-2020 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polycaster (Post 3077194)
Teppler... was brilliant. I still enjoy thinking about how a smart guy pretended to be dumb in order to troll dumb people pretending to be smart.

:D

Horza 01-30-2020 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horza (Post 3077136)
Could someone explain why right-wing lunatics always seem to know so much more about pop music than I do?


Polycaster 01-30-2020 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hyppon (Post 3077138)
First off, no one is calling you evil. I'm calling you what you are - racist.


Define racism. Can something be both true and racist at the same time?
If no, please quote what I say that is racist.
If yes, then you are saying racism can be truthful and it is not a rational description, instead it is merely a term to exert power by trying to shame people.

Horza 01-30-2020 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polycaster (Post 3077225)
Define racism. Can something be both true and racist at the same time?
If no, please quote what I say that is racist.
If yes, then you are saying racism can be truthful and it is not a rational description, instead it is merely a term to exert power by trying to shame people.

https://i.imgur.com/ovyqOo5.jpg

Hyppon 01-30-2020 05:42 PM

Quote:

Define racism. Can something be both true and racist at the same time?
Ahh, the definition game. A favorite of yours!


Quote:

If no, please quote what I say that is racist.
If yes, then you are saying racism can be truthful and it is not a rational description, instead it is merely a term to exert power by trying to shame people.
Argument Fallacies
How many can you count to?

Quote:

You have no arguments, only ad hominem, strawmen, and non sequiturs.
Still waiting on that thorough analysis of your own "evidence"

Skarne 01-30-2020 07:25 PM

Shut up Teppler.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.