Project 1999 - Can't we all just agree on one thing?

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)

- Rants and Flames (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=30)

- - Can't we all just agree on one thing? (/forums/showthread.php?t=348661)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polycaster (Post 3077194)

I still enjoy thinking about how a smart guy pretended to be dumb in order to troll dumb people pretending to be smart got inside your heads to such a degree.

Response:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horza (Post 3073923)

As we all know there's nothing smarter than pretending to be an idiot, especially a good looking one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polycaster (Post 3077194)

We've already done the AGW thing. Recap: I post evidence that the metrics and methodology of studies X,Y,Z are flawed, thereby disproving the 97% consensus claim. The only attempt at using data to disprove that was to cite those very same studies that claim there is a 97% consensus... One of the more relevant pieces of info was that individual scientists that were supposedly amongst the 97% came forward to say they were not amongst the 97%. You can't get much more debunked than that.

The levels to which you people use AJ as a way to discount valid information is itself a conspiracy theory worthy of AJ. You have no arguments, only ad hominem, strawmen, and non sequiturs.

Evidently you forgot about this, where all the arguments you made about global warming were completely and utterly destroyed:

Tzug, middle of page:
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...348192&page=24

Also, I've seen you use the term "non sequitur" probably 5-6 times now, and am still convinced you don't know what it means. Anytime you're responded to it's exactly in reference to something you said previously. That's the exact opposite of a "non-sequitur."

Still waiting for you to respond with how you're a "real American." Also convinced you don't know what that means, yet I'm dying to see your justification for what you've done that makes you such a great patriot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polycaster (Post 3077225)

Define racism. Can something be both true and racist at the same time?
If no, please quote what I say that is racist.
If yes, then you are saying racism can be truthful and it is not a rational description, instead it is merely a term to exert power by trying to shame people.

Truth in this instance is entirely subjective. People used to believe that those of a different race were not as smart, not as capable, not as worthy, of those that were white. That was a "truth" they believed in, but it wasn't an objective truth, it was entirely of their own design. So yes, something can be "true" (in the mind of the beholder) and an individual can fervently believe it, and can be entirely racist. Your truth isn't objective.

Damn systemic racism, causing those poor brown skin people to live in murder capitals of the world. If it wasn't for systemic racism Africa would have never gotten into this perpetual cycle of civil wars. IF IT WASN'T FOR COLONIALISM AND SYSTEMIC RACISM SOUTH AMERICA WOULD BE BEING INVADED BY WYPIPO, checkmate. My thesis was concluded by my big emotions and all statistics, IQ testing , geneology and thousands of years of history is just a product of systemic racism. thanks

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wutaan (Post 3077326)

Very edgy.

Well, today I died three times due to Seal Team trains and twice to Black Lotus trains. I would say both servers were filled with idiots.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hyppon (Post 3077138)

First off, no one is calling you evil. I'm calling you what you are - racist. Don't put words in my mouth, you put that label there. Is there something that you feel about yourself that you want to share?
Second off, did you read your study? I would take a long, hard look at it, particularly the Data & Measure section and especially the conclusion. Hell, just search for the term "casual", you'll find it attached to a sentence that will make whatever argument you are trying to make look flimsy and silly. There are much better studies out there on this topic (some of which even use NATIONAL data, as opposed to a city that is historically divided by race), and I think it's disgusting that you're trying to shoehorn a residential preference study in as evidence for your matter-of-fact diatribe about Democrats not wanting to live with whoever.

I don't identify with your stupid terms, I don't even care about them. Like I keep saying, you are far outside of the majority. If you don't think so, look at the data from the last election (I know it was REALLY important to you, since you keep referencing political stuff when on one else around you is even bothering with it). You will find a little over fifty percent of the population voted, where less than half of that % voted for Trump. That makes you a minority (I would argue it makes the Democrats a minority as well), and definitely explains why you are scared. I'm scared for you, too. I know wild animals that feel cornered tend to get violent.

OMG u kil him faster than a level 1 accidentally hitting autoattack instead of hail on King akanon

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wutaan (Post 3077326)

yikes

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wutaan (Post 3077326)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sethius Marlowe (Post 3077125)

This is fascinating. Can you teach us more about these pillars?

A quick web search found this.

https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/b...s-of-politics/

I'm not entirely sure of the bias of the source, but I'm familiar with Jonathan Haidt's work.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benanov (Post 3077551)

A quick web search found this.

https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/b...s-of-politics/

I'm not entirely sure of the bias of the source, but I'm familiar with Jonathan Haidt's work.

It's just not the same without Teppler's unhinged ranting about gay Jews in the entertainment industry.