Originally Posted by Tentarro (Post 3272518)

You immediately went for the semantics angle because you have fuck all to say.

Originally Posted by Tentarro (Post 3272524)

I brought it up as #2

Originally Posted by Ennewi (Post 3272528)

www.nytimes.com/2016/02/29/world/americas/a-chilean-ex-soldier-guiltily-recalls-his-units-atrocities.amp.html

As an 18-year-old soldier in the Chilean Army in 1973, Mr. Padilla was on patrol with his unit in a southern city when the owner of a supermarket turned in his own son, accusing him of supplying munitions and food to a guerrilla group. The soldiers threw the young man into a well and began shooting at him. Then they dragged out his bloody, bullet-riddled body, put it in a military truck and drove off. Mr. Padilla was watching from a nearby jeep.

“I never knew where he was taken, and not even his name,” he said.

Originally Posted by Ennewi (Post 3272529)

Semantics.

Originally Posted by Tentarro (Post 3272430)

Article with no sources, a lack of proofreading

Originally Posted by Ennewi (Post 3272434)

Yeah, loose instead of lose. Credibility undercut entirely.

Originally Posted by Horza (Post 3272439)

Sorry, but that typo means in order to be logically consistent you support extrajudicial killings now.

Originally Posted by Tentarro (Post 3272534)

Retard.



Imagine being killed after a coup because you supplied the enemy.

Originally Posted by Ennewi (Post 3272535)

It was your second point, but the point was first made by you and in the same post, a few backspaces and it would have been in the same sentence. But if you want to be so anal about it, neither of those posts immediately went for the semantics angle.







12-16 minutes after the fact, Biff Tannentarro. RNF almost needs its own UN for all of this petty squabbling over details.

Originally Posted by Ennewi (Post 3272536)

Allegedly. Where's your proof it happened in that one instance? Articles. Sources. Alarti.

Originally Posted by Tentarro (Post 3272537)

They literally did go for the semantics angle, do you know what semantics mean?