That’s the because “freedom bro” argument, already addressed that. You can doss it up in fancier colors but “I know what’s best for my kid” is still basically the same as “freedom bro”

But like I said, the counter is morality. “What is best for my kid” cannot apply to things that others could see as abusive. What if I thought what’s best for my kid is to let them eat to 200lbs. Would all conservatives support that because freedom bro? I know I sure wouldn’t

the issue isn't what the queers do with their own kids

it's that healthy and stable straight-as-in-not-crooked kids get exposed to the queer shit

How are you supposed to keep a huge hotel like that profitable without selling alcohol at events and what not? Just get it over with, shut the place down and start calling yourself the Florida gestapo.

Anti-vaxxers are called child abusers

lets go folks!

I think organized religion is abusive.

You minimize the name gestapo by this comparison.

Then feel free to support movements to shut down churches, and see how much traction it gains

Personally, I would like there to be as much or more emphasis on keeping your kids from seeing actual porn on their electronics, not getting addicted to electronics, not eating only shit food, and not living a socially isolated or sedentary lifestyle…than anything to do with drag. They are all far more damaging and affecting exponentially more kids

But then again, who’s to say backing one cause means not backing another

anyone i don't agree with is a nazi even if i don't agree with people that i agree with on other issues they are nazis and when i don't agree with people i otherwise agree with im a nazi and whoever doesn't agree with me and the people i agree with is a nazi then the others who agree with me but not the other people are nazis

My hotel takes in less profit = the same thing as Kristallnacht

:rolleyes:

Well what would you call it when the government starts shutting businesses down for being too LGBT-friendly?