There were several people the prosecution could have brought in to counter any character witness, I guarantee you it would have been ugly.

I just wish he would have testified and said something for himself, but I can just see the prosecution drilling him so damn hard he’d just dig himself deeper in a hole.

I feel like there was 3:1 prosecution witnesses compared to defense I wonder what that was all about?

They had a LOT of medical professionals testify. And they had to, if any complication other than asphyxiation was not ruled out then there was a good chance of a not guilty verdict. I mean we are talking murder here, you’re going to want multiple opinions for obvious reasons.

Im wondering why so little for the defense though? They just had that one guy that disagreed with all those witnesses the prosecution brought in, I thought he was going to do the exact opposite? Why not?

They had some use of force experts and doctors testify for the defense, it wasn’t so few as you put it. I felt that it seemed like enough to make a fair judgment on the case.

How was their case weak? They had several medical professionals testify that the asphyxiation was the cause of death and ruled out pretty much everything else. How much of the trial did you watch?

That being said, I agree with the judge said about disrespectful elected officials causing trouble with this trial. And I think Maxine Waters needs to shut up and retire already.

We get to laugh at you and the other idiots on this forum who constantly spout dumb ignorant shit. And in the future, when you feel the urge to spout your brain on the new hot topic of the day, we get to remind you how catastrophically wrong you were.

prosecution had 38 witnesses defense had 7.

and why would the defense want a fair judgement.

Because that’s what you want in any trial by jury?

the defense wants their client to get off