![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I can't do that here, charm on p99 breaks a lot more often. Still fun though. It's as close to classic as we'll ever get imo anyway so making most of it with all it's blemishes. Alternative is TLP servers which unfortunately go all the way to PoP, 2 expansions too many imo. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I remember that at the time, many thought shaman was a bad class because they didn't do much damage and didn't have particularly good heals, and damage shield was considered one of the most important buffs in the game which shamans didn't have. Few had figured out how much slows matter, or that canni-dancing can vastly increase your mana resources throughout a playsession. Things were just not known in 1999, and information wasn't widely available. Everyone was figuring it all out almost exclusively from personal experience and whatever their buddies told them, which was often hilariously incorrect. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
-Mcoy |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Anecdotes, individual recall from 23 years ago and confirmation bias. That some fantastic bird-lawyerin'.
|
Give clarity to wizards
delete enchanter class (since we're just saying stupid shit we would want) Possibly the charm breaking here is classic In that case, it is only the channeling that is not classic. I remember having to cast between enemy attacks, or else it was almost guaranteed interrupt. Here I just expect the cast to go off, and am surprised when it doesn't. Until not too long ago, pure melee classes had full channeling capabilities so rogue / monk / warrior could channel their clickies, when in reality those spells were 100% interrupted because of their lack of channeling. When you have a charm break and no where to go and can't re cast without good chance of interrupt the enchanter class is a lot different, and that maybe what we're seeing here. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.