Project 1999 - NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)

- Off Topic (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)

- - NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP (/forums/showthread.php?t=417177)

Quote:

Originally Posted by aussenseiter (Post 3629772)

I wager it's less of a footprint than produced chicken.

Gotta real thoroughly hose down the abattoir every night, for example.

For the most part chicken eat plant detritus, and bugs. They're not really big on fresh produce still living on the plants, so they actually do more of a clean up service, and scratch is dirt cheap at the feed stores to supplement em with

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trexller (Post 3629787)

oh yeah if you ever want to figure out why some weird shit is going on, always follow the money.

cybersecurity is the modern vault, the safe in which we store our valuables, so of course it's going to be taken seriously.

scientists basically get funded with money that nobody else needed or wanted, so naturally they are going to cheat on their research because if they came out and told the truth then next year they won't receive grants and charity funding

like any other type of discretionary spending, scientific research is an emotional effort like giving money to charities or non-profits

shit we should start looking into charities for the homeless or africa, i bet you'll find serious efforts to make sure they stay poor forever

Capitalism is the common thread that just won't tease at in this tapestry of bullshit

lol we've got a space telescope using 15 year old tech sitting at one of the sun's Lagrange points looking at 13.7 billion year old light. We developed a liponanoparticle enveloping synthetic mRNA your cells will accept and use to make whatever the fuck we tell them to. We've got LLM's damn near passing the turing test and automating thousands, likely soon to be millions of skilled jobs.

But no, science is retarded and fake and you should listen to some idiot on youtube. How dare those idiot sheeple try to use the scientific method to uncover fundamental truths about the universe. This process is responsible for modern civilization and you aren't even capable of understanding it much less meaningfully critiquing it.

Academia is broken but the scientific method and individual hard science fields are not.

You can't use facts to persuade someone's emotional decision, unfortunately. Fear makes some people paralyzed

Lost track of this thread again.

Back to my dystopia!

@Ripp

Quote:

Climate changes every day. You idiots

Weather changes everyday, idiot.

From NatGeo.

Quote:

While weather refers to short-term changes in the atmosphere, climate refers to atmospheric changes over longer periods of time, usually defined as 30 years or more.

Ripp, logic.

Edit bit
More from nasa site.

Quote:

Some people say "weather is what you get" and "climate is what you expect."

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duik (Post 3629805)

@Ripp
Weather changes everyday, idiot.

From NatGeo.

Ripp, logic.

Edit bit
More from nasa site.

That's why heatwaves don't count although they seem to. :p

Quote:

Originally Posted by aussenseiter (Post 3629808)

That's why heatwaves don't count although they seem to. :p

8 years ago now, but no one remembers

“BUT WE’RE BOILING NOW”

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lune (Post 3629798)

scientific method to uncover fundamental truths about the universe. This process is responsible for modern civilization and you aren't even capable of understanding it much less meaningfully critiquing it.

Lol. Science fails to see the fundamental truths right in front of it because it corroborates God as a construct of Mind hallucinating our shared reality.

Why does the mechanical function of ohmic resistance mirror cognitive dissonance?

What is gravity, and what is "Time" from a quantum perspective? If gravity is the curvature of space, then what is the angle of its effect on a Planck Length of distance between two masses?

Why do physicists make arbitrary rules about not allowing us to consider the perspective of the photon as it pertains to relativity?

Your "science" is full of holes bro. As the smartest man in this forum, I can't tell you with absolute certainty that they science you're espousing belief in, which you do not even understand as well as I do, is not comprehensive at all, and there's far more it doesn't know, then it's field of epistemology claims to know