Is Green 2.0 really on the horizon?
 

https://i.ibb.co/v41n8XTD/20.png

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=444822

Or am I being sold more wolf tickets from the same Barbarian who orchestrated the horrendous P99 wiki?

TBH either way it's kind of bad timing. Some of us are trying to take MnM seriously. I think it would have been more epic if they don't do a huge announce about a new P99 server, but rather, just merge the servers one day unannounced, and a few months later open a fresh server, also unannounced. Imagine the fomo and hype.

Not related to Green 2.0 whatsoever and don't worry you'll have plenty of time taking MnM seriously just like Pantheon before it, and whatever else comes after, or doesn't come at all as it were.

This has nothing to do with a new server

At any rate, no one cares about whether people are focused on MnM. I doubt that would factor into a decision on when to launch a new server.

People who care about human decency care.

Just because P1999 has an agreement with DB does not mean DB cannot adjust the agreement. My thoughts are that the THJ lawsuit has resulted in one agreement for the entire EMU base. That means no servers beyond Velious and a cap on player numbers.

I could be wrong, again these are just my thoughts but considering this involves all of the EQEMU, it is more than just P1999 fixing things.

You are in fact wrong, EQEmu folks stated publicly that the new restrictions they are enforcing do now impact the P99 servers due to P99 having their own separate agreement with DB.

However, the 2 talk to each other (systems wise), and therefore the changes that EQEMU needs to make to their servers to enforce their new restrictions are likely requiring P99 to also make updates to their servers.

It appears both administrators picked a date and time window where all parties could be available to take all the servers down on both ends, make the needed adjustments, and bring them back on line together to avoid unintended issues or disruptions of service.

That should read "not impact"*

On trademark/game-asset use, if there’s a dispute about what you’re allowed to use, Daybreak gets the “final say” and can require you to stop using anything it decides is impermissible.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...19107.53.4.pdf

There's a rift between login server operators/teams that they're doing good opsec to keep quiet.