![]() |
Kelin's lucid lullaby
Lets call it the bard aoe mez song.
This isnt working as intended. You shouldnt be able to reapply this song on "aoe mezzed" mobs over and over. It has to break first before you can reapply it, as per this circa 2000 post. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
This one also suggest it had a maximum of 4 targets. Quote:
Another one that suggest only 4 targets. Bards SHOULDNT be able to keep unlimited amount of mobs permanently mesmerized with this song. That was an ability only meant for enchanters. Right now a single bard can pull the whole dreadland zone or burning wood zone and keep the whole zone pretty much locked down, which is ridiculous. Not that anyone does that, but it could be done. |
It has a level cap (of 25?) so you can't just pull all of dreadlands, and also you didn't prove that you couldn't re-mez mezzed mobs with it. See this:
Quote:
There seems to be enough evidence that it could only mez up to 4 targets at once (at least at some point) but does that mean it was a pbae or a targeted ae? |
Theres no level cap on this right now.
Try it out for yourself. I dont really get your "spam click the song", if you keep playing a song -- doesnt it reapply itself as fast as clicking on it? I thought that was the case. Right now this song is causing issues on some raid encounter(eg: venril sathir being pulled to the zone line with 50 mobs, them all being CC'ed by one or two bards). Fixing this song would also fix issues with this encounter as a whole. You couldnt just pull him to the zone line unless you use some advanced pulling. It has to be changed. |
Ah, there was when it was still targeted on blue99 so I assumed it kept the level cap. I have strong evidence from an old castersrealm link that it should have a level cap in classic, let me find it.
edit: http://web.archive.org/web/200201131...?Id=996&Page=2 Quote:
edit again: I previously reported that it had a cap above level 55 but I was mistaken. I think it's capped at 55 currently on blue99 but it's still not nearly easy enough to resist. |
Quote:
^ Doesn't say that at all. It explains there are two checks, one vs MR and another vs level. And that the failure of the second check was not announced and needed to be addressed. http://members.fortunecity.com/drabqe/index.html ^ Also states it's a memblur, heh. http://blog.amin.org/dapeng/2010/03/21/ ^ It also states that using the Jonthan's line is useless if you have a worn haste item because they don't stack :rolleyes: http://brisk555666.tripod.com/id7.html Still just cut and paste from EQDiva that every other thread about this has been based on. I think in the actual entry, there are a few comments specifically stating this is wrong and that there isn't a target cap. Was brought up in another recent thread about this song. Quote:
Quote:
Anyways, I will agree that Kelin's isn't working as it should. But from reading, the only thing that is really missing in this point at time is the second level check to make it more resistable (or both checks are there, and they aren't working properly). This is the only thing I can see that's actually strongly supported by a reliable source from the first link. But he also mentions this check was present with the enchanter's line, too. Not to mention this check was removed at some point, not sure when though. I really hate to sound nit-picky, but I don't put a lot of faith in these Billy Bob's guide to whatever that half the time was cut and pasted from other guides without any actual due diligence. Or rife with glaring errors as already pointed out. And a lot of the time have several comments regarding an entry as plain wrong. If that's the level of scrutiny we're going with, I can dig up some REALLY fun stuff. :D |
Were talking about a 12 years old game with many patches over the years. When you can get your hand on entries that describes those spells and they're dated around 2000, you cant really go wrong. Sure theirs some fallacies here and there but fact is, its pretty accurate.
The knowledge about the game back then was very minimal. People learned a lot of things over the 12 years this has been online. Those guides surely arent very accurate but theres some information there that matches in all these entries and thats how you can make a much more accurate statement about these spells. From reading these entries, do you agree that the spell isnt working properly on this server? Max level, Number of targets, the two resist checks, I just wanted to point out that the current spell here is making bards unbalanced, they shouldnt be able to aoe mez 40 mobs at once. Thats wrong and thats what im looking to get fixed. |
That doesn't make sense. The fact that knowledge about these effects being minimal by people writing guides with a number of glaring inaccuracies that were commonly just copy pasted from other guides doesn't mean you "can't go wrong". To me, that means completely the opposite, you can go wrong very quickly and easily when dealing with these questions.
Not to mention the only reference you have that's actually dated 2000, is the one that doesn't say anything about it's number of targets and only addresses the resist rate issue, which I still infact believe is the only issue that is has any validity to to the claim that it is over powered. Anyways, like I said, here is the original song listing this whole thing seems to stem from: http://web.archive.org/web/200104211...gs.asp?song=15 Right off the bat you have someone saying that the entry is wrong, and if you go further in the timeline for that site you get more people saying that it is in fact wrong and they are able to mes more than 4 targets. You're disregarding the entries (EDIT: to be fair, just haven't seen them, sorry) that don't support your theory in and saying the ones that do support it are the only ones that are correct without really giving a good reason. Hell, the last link you provided it just a straight word for word copy and said as much. EDIT: Just wanted to add that I'm not trying to be argumentitive, but trying to nail down what this song actually was during this time period is like trying to nail jello to a wall =X |
I used to use this song with a bard friend of mine. We'd pull all of runnyeye; both would twist mez and AoE dots.
Original poster is right, the mez would just refresh. Further, playing a bard performing this role normally would not have to wait for it to expire. |
After looking up on EQdiva, im now certain this song is heavily bugged on p1999.
What happens on p1999: Bard aggro 100 mobs ranging from lvl 40-52, get them bunched up and will mez 95% of those mobs. Heres what should happen: Bard aggro 100 mobs ranging from lvl 40-52, get them bunched up and mezzes 20-25% of them, dieing quickly. Here's some supporting comments from EQdiva from the era: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It clearly isnt working as it should be and in its current form, way too overpowered. |
Resist rates on crission's pixie strike (level 28 mez) should also be a bit higher. This is confirmed by pretty much every classic source I've consulted and I've bug reported this numerous times already. Song of twilight was the best one, it didn't resist nearly as much as pixie strike, and when its night-only restriction was removed it probably resisted about as often as pixie strike currently does on p99 (ie, pretty much never unless the mob is extremely close to your level).
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.