[TarukShmaruk]

Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is the hilarious thing about this trial. You claim that you're somehow unbiased and that every "anti-Zimmerman sheep" is. Your entire post is riddled with betrayals to your own political and legal attitudes.

It's just backlash against the lynch mob. When I first heard about the incident (reported as a racist white guy) my thoughts were "fuck him hope he goes to prison"

Btw Zimmerman is a registered democrat [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Although I bet you he voted Romney last year.

I personally don't even have a stake in this trial outcome. I personally don't think the evidence is there to convict on murder 2, but I think manslaughter is more than accounted for. I think it comes down to, "Nobody truly knows what happened, and there is contrary and inconsistent evidence on both sides of the case." For everything you've cited, I could just as easily cite some inconsistency with Zimmerman's account. The problem is that you're taking Zimmerman's word as full and unconditional truth for some reason or another. I'm not going to take a guess at why you're so helplessly willing to adopt Zimmerman's self-defense claim as absolute and that any other theory is so full of holes. You're obviously cherry-picking evidence to support the conclusion you came to when this all first happened. That's fine, but please don't claim that everybody else is indulging in bias but you're not. That's sad and delusional.

The hard evidence, simply put, supports Zimmerman. That's if you're looking at the situation objectively and not placing your own 'gut feelings'.

But, what's more important than that, is that every ding the prosecution makes is worth 1/4th of every point the defense makes - remember, beyond a reasonable doubt is the name of the game.

With the injuries on Zimmerman - severe or not - and none on Trayvon, they perfectly corroborate his version of events. Remember, Zimmerman is claiming that Trayvon saw his gun and *that* is when Zimmerman got scared enough to draw and fire.

One of the biggest problems I have with this whole case is that pro-Zimmerman defense has turned from, "He's innocent because you can't prove otherwise!" into, "Trayvon was an evil hood rat that was destined to be killed one way or another because he was rotten and deserved it." You've hijacked the defense of an individual's self-protection and turned it into something wicked. That's the problem I have with this case. Every other Zimmerman acolyte is just as willing to hurl racist epithets and bigoted stereotypes as they are to say, "You haven't proved anything beyond a reasonable doubt." That's where your case is-- but you all take it somewhere disgusting.

There's a reason for this, and that's because we've been inundated with depictions of Zimmerman as this evil, racist, wannabe hero vigilante and Trayvon as this poor innocent kid.

Furthermore, people want to shout racism at the top of their lungs anytime someone simply acknowledges reality - everyone wants to pretend that a 17 y/o who's been in trouble at school, had suspicious jewelry that didn't belong to him in his locker, 'swung at a bus driver (according to one of his friends on twitter), and acted like a thug is just a harmless teenager because they think it's some badge of anti-racism purity to ignore the facts.

But go on with your "Don't trust the liberal media" hype and other band-wagon, "Don't be a sheep!" talking points as you yourself are fed pre-digested opinions and societal conceptions. Just know that you're a bleeding hypocrite.

?

NBC (liberal) doctored the 911 calls to make Zimmerman seem racist.

Liberal media outlets plastered the jumpsuit image of Zimmerman and the years-old image of innocent child Trayvon.

CNN just plastered his fucking SSN and other personal information on TV - oops.

I think my points are well founded.