Quote:
Originally Posted by cyryllis
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
thanks rogean for the completely unprofessional approach to this situation. Maybe you should make it a bit more clear that it was not 86 cheating members, but rather massive collateral damage being dealt because people at one time or another trusted someone who happened to be cheating.
|
Because 2 people knowing about an exploit and not sharing it with other people is completely believable. Now no one is saying all 86 accounts are guilty. But trying to say no one in the guild but those 2 knew is seriously failed logic. If Froovy was a great guy with lots of friends... Why would he share his exploit with just 1 single person ? See your own argument for why he had access to those accounts is also working against you here.
"He's so helpful"
"He is a great guy"
"He spent lots of time online tracking"
According to you and your members this was a guy that was nice and helpful.. Yet you guys then turn around and say that when your "Friend" found an exploit he only told one solitary single person to help him use it. See how that argument makes no sense at all to anyone that is keeping up with this ? You guys all trusted him with your accounts... But he wouldn't in turn trust you guys with an exploit he was getting away with until today ?