[JayN]

Originally Posted by goshozal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A better analogy would be:

Server staff sets up a dogfighting ring. Guilds are the dogs. Only the most vicious and relentless dogs get enough to eat (loot). Dogs fight for three years. After the first year, one top dog emerges that is a freaking machine at killing the other dogs. He ends up getting almost all of the food, and he hoards it, burying stockpiles everywhere and rewarding other dogs who join his pack. Every now and then a good challenger comes along, but for the most part it's a one-dog show.

Then the server staff comes in one day and decides that they're tired of the noisy dogfights, blames the whole debacle on the dogs, and now all the dogs have to figure out how to divide the food, or all of them will starve.

Conveniently ignored is the fact that there isn't enough food for all the dogs to eat their fill.

Or, if you're not an analogy fan:



***edit disclaimer: My opinions are my own, and not endorsed in any way by my guild. But I logged into Server Chat to see my fellow players being compared to bickering women trying to divide something that can't be divided. And I just hate bad analogies.
***second edit disclaimer: hoards, not hordes.

Confirmed us dogs need velious!