Quote:
Originally Posted by Roth
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've never understood why being neutral on every possible thing and not admitting to liking or disliking anything has become a virtue. I prefer the game without pok books and where it's not about becoming as op as you possibly can. So why the hell am I not allowed to have an opinion that I think eq WITHOUT pop is better? do you need to be an internet crusader and make sure no one says anything is better than anything else?
|
No, I happen to be a fan of EQ in all forms (mostly) and that's what I have a need to be a crusader about. I started the game in the 3rd week live. Had 90 days played when my toon hit his first birthday in real time. Loved classic. But loved beyond too.
Have your opinion. But the game didn't "end" or "die" or any of the melodramatic shit that gets bandied about here about post-velious. You just didn't like it. And that's fine. I was there and, personally, loved it all thru about PoR, personally.
People site clicky books as " the end" of the game. Really, what happened was we traded mundane shit like boat travel that had its novelty wear off years earlier, and having to buy ports, for exp mobs that didn't just summon, but also flurried and rampaged. For every thing that got easier, something else got more challenging. During PoP era having a slower wasn't a plus, it became required, for example.