Quote:
Originally Posted by moklianne
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Its public land. Just because the government didn't have a purpose for this land in the past and didn't care what he did with it doesn't mean he was legally using it. Now there is a purpose for the land that the government owns. I fail to see why people are not seeing this. This has nothing to do with freedom.
If I owned property and I didn't do anything with it, does that mean its okay for someone to let their cattle graze on it? Then, if I suddenly want to develop on that land, I can't because they are already grazing on it?
|
If the government has use for the land, they can just use it? If they want to build a solar farm on it, just do it and throw a fence around it so the cattle can't poop on the reflectors or whatever? This isn't about land that they suddenly want to use for other things. It's about the government wanting to collect more money in any way they can. And has been pointed out, this land really should belong to the state of Nevada.