that's not what you said though. if you're going to back track to specifics to reinforce a point and make another claim along a general trace of the original then why not make the specific claim in the first place?
it's being worked on, but the funding for it isn't going to be enough for anything to get done anytime soon unfortunately. projects could be (part of me says should be) scrapped though because there are molten salt reactors (fission process) that are stable, safe, and efficient with very little waste byproduct when compared to fission reactors built a few decades ago. nuclear energy is safer than ever now, but the public hears "nuclear energy" and thinks 3-mile island or chernobyl without know anything specific about those incidents.
|