That isn't my starting stance. That is my stance that after providing quotes from a raid in-era, people decided to question it. Which is fair, but I think his posts elaborate more than just a 52 paladin trying to stun but instead his entire raid not being able to land stun, snare or anything. As quoted below.
Quote:
Thank especially Erollisi Marr!
by Aegiral
It is through her that we all survived a bout that could (the) end catastrophically, the Dartain against the Lost!
This guy was incredibly MR, no way to snare, to stun ... Nothing!
And when it started to leak (add 2 spectra) to the tower, incredible but true ben one of my root pass and eventually held suffisemment long as the one before it completes passes porch (hello train).
Divine intervention I tell you!
Yep I deserved this shield!
|
Coupled with the behind the scene magic resistance flags Alunova mentions... I just don't see why the onus is on me to further prove the point?
If I had started with no quotes and argued for him to be MR resistant and followed up with, show me evidence that he isn't, that's fine. But with evidence that he is, even though it's from a low 50s paladin, the burden falls on someone else to counter that with a single post.
Your argument that he isn't MR stems from the fact that he is stun immune and the quote is a 52 paladin?
Also correct me if I'm wrong, weren't classic stun rules no giants and levels 1-55 (which included 55). While 56+ were immune? Cause after the patch which added level caps on all that stuff when they decided to increase levels, the PBAE stuns for chanters and the paladin stuns were given a level cap of 55, which worked on 55.
So shouldn't he be stunable if he weren't too resistant?