Quote:
Originally Posted by Eliseus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You CLEARLY argued point of views that you ADMIT you have no idea what you are talking about.
|
Still falling into simplistic conflation, just like from the very beginning. Demonstrating intellectual honesty, which is what I just did, doesn't invalidate any of my arguments. Again (I've never had to say "again" so many times), every admission I made in the last few posts I had already made earlier in the thread. Science doesn't jump to conclusions; creationism, and every immoral subset underneath it, simply does. This creates inherent, intrinsic immorality and I will not apologize for pointing this out, and I will reiterate it as many times as is necessary.
And just so you know, I wasn't saying I misled you. I wasn't trying to lead you anywhere, but rather show you how to think in a morally acceptable way. I am saying that you've been misled, probably by most of the people you think are your friends. No one develops a psychology like yours alone. I've seen it too many times to not know better.
Now, if you want to rebut with some actual points about how I've contradicted myself, then go right ahead. I can assure you I haven't, because I've been intellectually honest with you all from the start.
And I'm done now. I have actual real things to attend to - you know, like contributing to a secular society that has come about because of science.