Quote:
Originally Posted by leewong
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"All Natural Selection proves is that weak life forms die. "
Ughh, were do you come up with this crap? Natural selection doesnt prove weak life forms die. Dont be dense. If an organism can live long enough to procreate then it is going to pass along it's DNA. Nature works with what it's got. Put a large species on a small island and in a few hundred generations they will be smaller in stature. Smaller organisms eat less so it is a favored trait in harsh times.
|
Hilarious
You really have no idea wtf you are talking about. Natural Selection has always been about survival of the fittest. Weak life forms die. Duh. So now your magical force for Evolution lies are reproductive organs? How did those evolve and come about from Nothing? Secondly, all reproduction does is create variations of existing genetic code. There isn't a single example that can be given of spontaneous new genetic information and data being written to the genome from pure randomness and Nothing.
My suggestion to you would be bow out of this discussion while you still have some dignity left. All you're doing is digging more holes with each response and showing you have a complete lack of understanding of the BS theory you are trying to trumpet.
Quote:
"It doesn't write new legible genetic code"
Wrong. Scientists have even seen it in the lab.
|
Nope
New, legible and completely never before seen information spontaneously creating itself has never been witnessed. Never will be.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g
Quote:
|
"It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991) increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003) novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996) novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)
|
A mutation is a random chaotic and destructive force. Not a creative force. The odds that a mutation would add legible information that actually works in harmony with existing code is like putting a chimp at a typewriter and expecting him to write the next Masterpiece of Literature. Even those odds are better than the book completely writing itself from Nothing with the only creative mechanism being harmful mutations which scramble genetic code and Time.
Quote:
If these do not qualify as information, then nothing about information is relevant to evolution in the first place."
There you go...research papers and all. Tested and verified.
|
You're just copying and pasting shit without thinking it through because you don't have a proper grasp and understanding of it. Pretty sad actually.