Quote:
Originally Posted by Virtuosos
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
fine...it IS nice to have a sk and a RANGER...but no reason to add that PALADIN and that OTHER SHADOWKNIGHT...
you missed my meaning completely, i was saying that having 4 hybrids in a group is senseless, much rather have a tank hybrid and some other hybrid as dps/whatever they can offer as a class and then a monk...a rogue....some actual form of pure dps.
and hybrids, atleast us paladins and shadowknights, are exceptionally useful and well worth the penelty...the sheer amount of versitility they offer to a group goes without speaking: i wont mention the other hybrids as i have no experience with them playing-wise. to say that we ARENT worth it is senseless.
|
Not adding the Paladin and that other Shadowknight is not about them being hybrids, it's about them being tanks. You don't need 3 tanks in the group...
As for a bard or ranger, I think they are useful and deserve to be added to the group if their type of usefulness is required/helpful (don't knock the rangers, well played they are useful). I don't play either of those classes, but I would not turn them down because of some penalty. I just want to level and have fun, and if I level slowly, that's more time for me to enjoy the fun EQ offers.