Quote:
|
If you want to raid end game content, you have to leave the loving protection class R affords you, it is really as simple as that. It isn't about whether class C could handle the competition, more that they negotiated this agreement in good faith, and expect it to be honored, just as you expect them to honor your classes rotation. If you want to remove protections afforded to guilds, I'm sure class C would be happy to go back to the way it was, with no class system or bag limits, but to continually try to alter the agreement in your favor when class C has continued to honor their's indicates to me that class C isn't the real problem.
|
Class C didn't negotiate anything in good faith - no one did in fact.
What we have is what Rogean gave to us, with much kicking and screaming from Class C.
Quote:
|
A lot of that makes sense as well, but if class R is supposed to be a stepping stone, by removing FFA mobs you are removing opportunities for guilds to practice against class C guilds outside of repops. (1 per month?) I would imagine the FFAs would equal more opportunities to practice and hone your skills against class C guilds without sacrificing the class R designated spawns, enabling guilds to move up faster.
|
Except that is only the GMs perception - no one in Class R views FFA cycle as a stepping stone, because no one in Class R would ever dream of moving up to Class C. It's a different play style - the majority of players Class R guilds have recruited wouldn't take the change well and any Class R guild going to Class C would quickly destroy itself. Anyone who wanted to play like a Class C guild are already a part of one.
The whole point is to separate the two play styles completely.