Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Bison
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Simply put, in US we have significantly more options when it comes to food. Smaller countries, like Somalia, arent as lucky in that respect. If someone is trying to sell expired food in the US, you just dont buy it. The country is large enough to support several sources of farm land/livestock.
Free market would improve the quality of PDAs by answering directly to its customers. You pay for the protection law enforcement provides you already. The only difference between Friedman's model and today's standard is that you would get to choose who provides that service for you, as opposed to that money being involuntarily taken out of your paycheck every week. Another way it would improve quality is a PDA would have to provide you with service-provider financial statements. So when you notice that your PDA just spent $100,000 on something you dont feel is necessary to your protection you can drop their service and seek another PDA that fits your needs more accordingly. Extrapolating that, if enough people notice this unnecessary spending from a specific PDA and in turn drop their service. That PDA will be forced to either change its spending habits or face bankruptcy.
|
Don't debate the proles Bison, them pickin's is easy. I'm here for you baby.
So the problem with your idea of quality improvement in PDA's is that people actually suffer in the interim while they sort the details and get shit wrong trying to bust a profit. If YOUR grandmother was raped in her bathroom while the cops were busy responding to a cost-benefit analysis memo, I think you'd be pretty pissed off.
Also, you're talking post-America here dude, so don't bring "american exceptionalism" into this debate please. I know that other dude that posted set you up on your soapbox, but let's keep this debate grounded? Propaganda is for the Weak mind Bison, you're better than that.