View Single Post
  #6  
Old 01-29-2015, 06:33 PM
Anichek Anichek is offline
Sarnak

Anichek's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You need to have a little more respect for your peers and own your decisions.
Let's not turn Raid Discussion into an RnF thread.

BDA, who has remained neutral on almost every single front and concern inside Class R (and when not neutral, has sided with the majority or the smaller guilds) has brought forward some change.

This is the first iteration where change has been proposed and backed by BDA that has anything but a net positive impact to the smaller guilds, and net negative to the bigger guilds. The funny thing is, that net negative impact impacts every guild in the rotation.
  1. Accountability - when you're up for a mob, you kill it, with something resembling a sense of urgency (60 minutes on most, 90 on CT)
  2. Commitment - if you ally on one mob, ally on them all. Don't water down lists with splits on some, teams on another.
  3. Progression - it already occurs naturally, as guilds grow...why not build the structure around it?

We all will have to be more sharp on our toes, due to the shorter engages and 100% full raid window accountability for the solo guild or your alliance occupying that slot. It's a uniform policy that applies to all guilds in the rotation, not targeted at one guild.

We believe it's fair that if you ally on raid content, ally on all of it in a rotation system. Once again, a decision that each guild makes when they enter the rotation - team up, go solo, etc. BDA's not force feeding your choices to you.

What you do as a guild on FFA mobs is up to you, the buddy system wouldn't apply in an FFA situation (both on Class R FFA and on Server FFA)
__________________
Anichek Dudeki
Officer, Guild Relations
Bregan D'Aerth