Quote:
Originally Posted by Argh
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So you were/are wrong then?
|
Idealistically, I'd like to think there's a playstyle difference between class R and class C, and as the past year of the rotation has demonstrated that's probably an accurate statement. I don't want to see the rotation blow up but changes were necessary to make it more fair to the bigger guilds. BDA played peacekeeper and enforcer this entire time with Div/Taken having mindsets that are close to what's just been proposed and everyone else having a mindset closer to the old rotation guidelines.
BDA got tired of playing peacekeeper and we've called for tighter rotation regulations (which is exactly what Divinity/Taken wanted from the beginning) but suddenly we're the hypocrites and destroyers of the rotation. The system had flaws, we want the flaws fixed, simple as that. Unfortunately, being the enforcer is a double edged sword.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fanguru
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's compatible. The primary goal for going C is to get VP kills. To get there, a R guild has to sacrifice their playstyle.
|
Basically. Under optimal conditions with people giving out their info to be shared we maximized every single VP account we could get and dropped Hoshkar on our 3rd try. Nexona, we wiped once. Everything else we obliterated in VP. It still doesn't mean we're ready for the shitshow that is IB/TMO VP fights.