Quote:
Originally Posted by Henini
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
reading this article , I couldn't help but thinking that guy never made it to 60 and probably not even to 55.
his point of views and comments are very "noobish"
2-3 days per dungeon?
c'mon there are more then 2-3 camps per dungeon first off.
you could spend a month in seb and still not have worn out the novelty of the place, cuz you go from one camp to an other, and it's so big.
sorry but 58+ doing reets and juggs, is really something the first couple of times. Even doing shroom king...
anyways...
|
You and Thott are kind of arguing the same thing from different points of view.
One major point of his Kunark Problem is that a player could feasibly level from 51 to 60 and never see any content other than that one dungeon. The very nature of exp grinding doesn't encourage exploration or really even doing anything other than the leveling treadmill. You pick out Sebilis, but I dont feel like Sebilis is indicative of Kunark. Karnors' is much more realistic, theres not a lot of variety in KC, its dogs, in some form, in some room, a small contingent of Undead, or the raid on VS.
I don't disagree with you that 2-3 days to 'completely use up a dungeon' may be off, but realistically, if in the example of SolB, you did Royals for 3 hours, then BnB for a while, then the next day got lucky and got in on some Fire Giants, you'd feel like you had a pretty solid handle on the place.