Quote:
Originally Posted by Juryiel
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I did not see the months of negotiations so I won't speak to that, but it's not the ultimatum that's the biggest problem there. It's the terms. If the terms in these negotiations included stuff like the gatekeeper mobs that were harder than the actual mobs they were gating, and really shortened kill windows on engages / kills like the version of the proposal that was made public, then of course these terms will be rejected by smaller guilds even if you debate them for months.
But I don't know what was in the other proposals. It seems odd that previous proposals would be more reasonable though and the one right before the rotation ended would be the least reasonable one (because that one was not very reasonable from my eyes as a member of a small guild, even if I do appreciate the issues with fairer allocation of rotation slots that the big guilds were concerned about). So I'm going to assume previous proposals were yet worse for smaller guilds.
|
The first list of gatekeeper mobs was considered too tough, Sirken eventually signed off on the list but by then the smaller guilds were never going to accept any of the other changes (ally for one means you ally for all, etc) BDA and specifically Anichek put a lot of time into finding a better system but it was quickly shot down, months is probably a stretch.