[Lune]

Originally Posted by James_Joyce [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you have any facts to back that up? Whether it was purposeful maneuvering or order through chaos is a matter of 100% speculation.

What is not speculation is that there is a clearly demonstrated conflict of interest between the past war-profiteers running our government and the needs of the American people. It's not speculation that every single currently relevant pol genuflects for their Israeli puppetmasters, who through their control of campaign finance and media messaging have their fingers firmly around the throat of every big American politician, and it's not speculation that those puppeteers have a vested interest in capitalizing on American intervention in the Middle East.

Inb4 Bernie has few corporate sponsors. Most of his larger donors are Jewish Mafia-dominated organizations like the Teamsters union. He bends over backwards to take Black Lives up his ass in public. He has already demonstrated his complete subservience and slavery to the demands of media messaging.

The only thing that sets TRUMP apart is that mistrust of "mainstream" (Jewish-dominated) media is at an all-time and the man is the first person able to stand in opposition to them without meeting rapid destruction in quite some time. I'm not saying he's not a Zionist puppet; I don't feel strongly that way. All I'm able to say is that he's the only candidate with even a plausible chance of exercising autonomy. There is literally no other option with even a theoretical ability to exercise Presidential authority. And the Zionist establishment does indeed seem desperate to destroy him, doesn't it?

Every other candidate is 100% guaranteed to be a total facade with hands completely tied the moment he steps into office. TRUMP is the only option with even a tiny chance of not fitting into this category.

As for the odds he will actually usher in a new golden age of America first? See picture below.

But even still, a TRUMP presidency could shatter the iron grip on discourse that the systems of social marxism and political correctness, through Jewish-dominated corporate media and politicized humanities "education" (which Bernie wants to scale up with subsidies[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]), have inflicted on us for decades. This could open the door for a future candidate who not only stands apart from the establishment in image and a single issue (immigration), but in substance and fundamental principles.

That's the best outcome I can realistically offer you from this election. Any other choice is guaranteed to bring more of the same with zero light at the end of the tunnel. And if you take the cynical view that every president has a gun pointed at his head every moment of every day, you might as well choose the funniest of Jeff Dunham's shitty puppets anyway.

Damn that's a pretty good case for Trump, I can't really argue with it except for stupid minutiae.

Most of what you're hitting on are areas where I already view Trump favorably. His economics and toxic negativity are a deal-breaker for me though. It's one thing to eschew political correctness, and it's another to embody the vile, disrespectful, petty contempt for others that our civil culture generally prides itself on being above. The South cheered and celebrated when Charles Sumner was caned to death on the floor of Congress, and look where the South is now.

I don't think Bernie bending over for BLM is subservience to the media. Bernie was a multiculturalist and pro-black long before he was running for president, and he hasn't compromised any of his other beliefs for political gain. You're mostly just exploiting the imagery of his speech being interrupted to make him look like a cuck. He had the balls to label himself a socialist when that's a poisonous word, and the media is far from kind to Bernie, largely ignoring and dismissing him in favor of Hillary.

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Most republican voters are poor. So are democratic voters. I guess you don't understand the income pyramid.

Neither party works for the poor. Your party signed NAFTA and is salivating to sign TPP. The two parties are identical, except one gives a pass to minorities who don't even try to work. Sorry, I'm an immigrant and have had a harder life than any Mexican or African-American. I'd burn my money before I contribute a cent to people who blame others for all of their problems

Democrats are supported by the overwhelming majority of unions. Republicans are not. Labor unions are one of the greatest forces for the health of the middle class, and their decline is one of the greatest factors precipitating the death of the middle class.

I don't disagree that both parties are shit, and they both are so corrupt they ultimately both end up boning the poor. But note I'm not supporting a "democrat", I'm supporting Sanders, who does not support the TPP.