[Sidelle]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

 

inst it amazing tho (I'm sure you just as I did, just as everyone I've ever known did) was sure the father of one of the boys, that crazy ass dude, was the murderer? For two documentaries, for years in between them I was sure it was him.. then all of the sudden they introduce this new suspect that third doc that had pretty much completely left out, that was never really investigated and its like 10 seconds of his interview your like HOLY SHIT THAT FUCKER DID IT WHOAH! so much so even the dad was like IT WASN'T THESE KIDS, IT WAS THIS GUY!... that just really stuck with me how you can see so much evidence, be so convinced about something, and so quickly can be proved wrong, whoah!!!

another thing I thought was suuuuuper interesting was in part 2, there is a new crime scene investigator looking at the evidence for the documentary and he is just like, left and right throwing out all these amazing statements about the evidence that you're like HOLY SHIT THIS GUY IS AMAZING! he knows EVERYTHING about this scene, how could they still be in jail?! with this guy knowing so much amazing shit!?!! he is SO SMART!!... but then then again, in the 3rd documentary, they bring out an even better attorney that is like, "uh those are not knife marks, they are from a coyote and they generally eat the groin because of the soft flesh etc etc and its like EVERYTHING the guy in part two said, (who seemed so smart and correct when reviewing all the evidence) gets completely dashed apart by this even better attorney.

It just really showed me in that doc how you can believe something, you can think it makes so much sense, you can even see it in court TWICE and have many people insist that X means Y and you'll believe it, but you can STILL be wrong.

There was so much I thought was so right, so much that everyone Ive known thought was right about that case that was just ripped apart by the amazing attorney hired in part three, that it just really is eye opening that its just damn hard to tell what the fuck actually really happened in any situation like that.

I dont think I could be a juror cus id just be like, INNOCENT! HES INNOCENT IDK WTF IDK HOW WE CAN THINK WERE RIGHT. I CANT SEND SOMEONE TO JAIL FOR SOMETHING IDK. INNOCENT.

So yea id make a terrible juror heh

 

Lol, it's possible I need to watch #3 again. Seems like I've forgotten some things. I know they get released eventually but I can't remember a lot of it. They were all really good and totally worth watching again.