So my question is larger than the forsaken specific incident and maybe it should have been posed that way.
"Volume of Infractions" (capitalized as a proper noun because they are invoking it as a freestanding clause) in this case is a multitude of infractions related to 7 day mobs. I don't believe any of the infractions in this specific scenario involved a 3 day mob and certainly not more than half. Therefore, this scenario is committing them to a punishment that is at best effective for a minority of infractions and at worst effective for none of them.
If this ruling is effective for NONE of the "volume of infractions" then you can certainly see how important this is for us to bring up and understand what it means.
If we have guilds capable of committing infractions to such a volume that it warrants a general suspension and receiving no tangible punishment (and they can do this twice before actually receiving a relevant punishment) then that means that I, as a guild leader, am encouraged to consider this system as a "2-freebie cheat card"-- as long as none of my infractions involve 3-day mobs.
|