Quote:
Originally Posted by Signal
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just a grossly false statement. Nothing was more competitive than IB vs TMO in the VP FTE days. That is just a fact. TMO before those days were a good guild. However, they also had the benefit of being able to train with the larger raid force in VP to keep competition at bay. The other guilds weren't on equal footing with them because of the time they had for uncontested mobs. A great guild yes. But they really didn't have an equal raid force contesting them for much of that time. So we will never know if they could have matched up without that training ability in place.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loke
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Were you around for DA vs IB? Because your join date indicates you weren't. DA got competitive around april/may of 2010, a full year before your join date. Not sure how you can compare two time periods when you didn't experience one of them.
|
I can back up signal's statement. I was around.
TMO is clearly the most dominant guild by quite a lot. I'd put IB waaay ahead of Rampage though. IB dominated stale Classic and Early Kunark content before TMO was even made. VP was brand new when IB quit far far from stale content. (People still thought Velious was on the horizon too ROFL).
TMO didn't need a larger raid force to keep IB dead. Zeelot held IB(new TR) when you decided to break a rotation while TMO finished a sky raid. 1 person.
You're arguments are false and scream of some neckbeard trying to defend his "wounded video game honor". Facts are facts though.