[big_ole_jpn]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Okay. It's rather easy. Here (*points at the Cartesian Ego presented by the coFrenchPerson). The endowment isn't satisfied by an a priori framing which is a crucial condition for the satisfaction of an argument conditioned by tiers of any kind. By conditioning the statement with the quality of being endowed, such a foundation does not satisfy the a priori, that implies a greater tier that has the capacity to enact such an endowment. If freedom is the initial premise then such a systematic tier system would not be necessary thus not promoting any progeneration or progression. If equality is the initil premise then such a systematic tier system would not be necessary thus not promoting any progeneration or progression. Boil the notions down to their foundation then the notions morph to something that promotes a progeneration or progression that maintains that tier based system conserving its premises. The ego portion ties into whether or not that tier system is subjectively valid (the numerous fallacies associated wkth that). So the foundation becomes a mere subjectivity argued in certain premises, you see?

drugs