Quote:
Originally Posted by R Flair
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Im confused, are you opposed to the US going after Isis
|
Please explain to me how you would propose we "go after isis"?
Do we just invade and flood Syria with American troops? What happens when they put away their black flags and towels and start planting IED's as 'civilians'? How would it be any different than Iraq, Vietnam, or Afghanistan when, over 10 years and hundreds of billions of dollars later, we'd have accomplished nothing and probably just made things worse?
You cannot "win" a counter-insurgency occupation under the current rules of engagement.
People who support deploying American troops against ISIS are fucking retarded.
The only way to win the war against Islam without systematically exterminating Muslims is to:
1. Achieve energy independence from Arab oil.
2. Enact a policy of economic, cultural, and social containment where Islamic countries (or any country with a non-secular culture/constitution/government) aren't allowed to consort with the rest of the world, and
certainly not allowed to immigrate unless extensively vetted.
3. Weather the inevitable terrorist attacks without flying off the handle and invading somewhere, which is exactly what they want. Retribution comes by persevering with #1 and #2, continuing to allow Western life to flourish and the Middle East to rot until they figure out how to get their own shit together.
The way you don't win a war against Islam is:
1. Hand-delivering valuable Western lives to their shithole countries where life is meaningless and suicide attacks are ubiquitous, and crippling our own domestic development by squandering hundreds of billions of dollars on nothing.
It was Bin Laden's plan and it's ISIS's goal.