Quote:
Originally Posted by Raavak
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've heard a couple times now nazis being referred to as capitalists. Wtf, "Socialist" is half the meaning of Nazi. Nazi Germany had a socialist command-and-control economy.
Almost bad as the "antifa" so-called-antifascists being, in fact, purely fascist.
|
Sweden, Norway, Denmark etc..
It's funny that their are all these real countries in plain sight to free market fundamentalists, but they insist that
has to be Stalin in Russia or Hitler in Germany in 1940's....
Indoctrination. Your repeating tired old red scare propaganda as the entire country is robbed by free-market fundamentalism. It's a good thing they don't teach that shit to kids anymore.
And BTW: To academics (including historians), Fascism is not Socialism or even Communism. Fascism didn't even change the fundamental economic structure of Germany at the time. Just added some well-fare mostly. It did only in the sense that you needed to be in the Nazi party to do business, and you needed to make sure you were being a good Nazi while doing business.
But the main reason academics think its weird to call him a socialist is because Hitler rounded up all the Marxists and radical socialists and killed them asap. He repeatedly referred to socialism as an enemy to his ideology of Nazism.
What Stalin and Hitler have in common was not really politics but methods. They were both totalitarian meaning they believed in government totally controlling all elements of people's lives. North Korea is a modern example (which is actually communist).